From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261977AbVAHWWF (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:22:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262033AbVAHWVi (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:21:38 -0500 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:35244 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261977AbVAHWUV (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:20:21 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM From: Lee Revell To: ross@lug.udel.edu Cc: "Jack O'Quin" , Chris Wright , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , paul@linuxaudiosystems.com, arjanv@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050108165657.GA21760@jose.lug.udel.edu> References: <200501071620.j07GKrIa018718@localhost.localdomain> <1105132348.20278.88.camel@krustophenia.net> <20050107134941.11cecbfc.akpm@osdl.org> <20050107221059.GA17392@infradead.org> <20050107142920.K2357@build.pdx.osdl.net> <87mzvkxxck.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050108165657.GA21760@jose.lug.udel.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:20:18 -0500 Message-Id: <1105222819.24592.131.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2005-01-08 at 11:56 -0500, ross@lug.udel.edu wrote: > Not to mention that not everyone chooses to use PAM for precisely this > reason. Slackware has never included PAM and probably never will. > My audio workstation has worked swell with the 2.4+caps solution and > the 2.6+LSM solution. PAM would break me ::-( Hmm. How could you (for example) configure all your machines to authenticate against an LDAP server without PAM? Lee