From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261183AbVAMHUc (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 02:20:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261184AbVAMHUc (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 02:20:32 -0500 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:52157 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261183AbVAMHU2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 02:20:28 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC] Avoiding fragmentation through different allocator From: Trond Myklebust To: Matt Mackall Cc: Mel Gorman , Linux Memory Management List , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20050113070314.GL2995@waste.org> References: <20050113070314.GL2995@waste.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 02:20:01 -0500 Message-Id: <1105600801.11555.6.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. Contact postmaster@uio.no if you have questions about this scanning X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0, required 12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org on den 12.01.2005 Klokka 23:03 (-0800) skreiv Matt Mackall: > You might stress higher order page allocation with a) 8k stacks turned > on b) UDP NFS with large read/write. b) Unless your network uses jumbo frames, UDP NFS should not be doing higher order page allocation. Cheers, Trond -- Trond Myklebust