From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261886AbVANDgl (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:36:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261862AbVANDeU (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:34:20 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.176]:41961 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261905AbVAND3W (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:29:22 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM From: utz lehmann To: Andrew Morton Cc: Con Kolivas , rlrevell@joe-job.com, arjanv@redhat.com, joq@io.com, chrisw@osdl.org, paul@linuxaudiosystems.com, mpm@selenic.com, hch@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, LKML In-Reply-To: <20050113192028.248b39ed.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20050111214152.GA17943@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <200501112251.j0BMp9iZ006964@localhost.localdomain> <20050111150556.S10567@build.pdx.osdl.net> <87y8ezzake.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050112074906.GB5735@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <87oefuma3c.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050113072802.GB13195@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <878y6x9h2d.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050113210750.GA22208@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <1105651508.3457.31.camel@krustophenia.net> <1105668319.15692.16.camel@segv.aura.of.mankind> <41E729A9.7060005@kolivas.org> <1105670137.15692.36.camel@segv.aura.of.mankind> <41E7319A.202@kolivas.org> <20050113192028.248b39ed.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 04:28:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1105673318.15692.43.camel@segv.aura.of.mankind> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:5a3828f1c4d839cf12e8a3b808f7ed34 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 19:20 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Con Kolivas wrote: > > > > > btw: Are RT tasks excluded by the oom killer? > > > > I haven't looked. VM hackers? > > Nope. We're nastier to tasks which have been niced down, but we're not > nicer to tasks which have been given elevated priority/policy. Maybe this should be done? RT tasks are somewhat important i think.