From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262118AbVAOBv6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:51:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262137AbVAOBuE (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:50:04 -0500 Received: from [81.2.110.250] ([81.2.110.250]:55273 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262118AbVAOBlS (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:41:18 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pci: Block config access during BIST (resend) From: Alan Cox To: Andi Kleen Cc: brking@us.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20050113215044.GA1504@muc.de> References: <41E2AC74.9090904@us.ibm.com> <20050110162950.GB14039@muc.de> <41E3086D.90506@us.ibm.com> <1105454259.15794.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050111173332.GA17077@muc.de> <1105626399.4664.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050113180347.GB17600@muc.de> <1105641991.4664.73.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050113202354.GA67143@muc.de> <1105645491.4624.114.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050113215044.GA1504@muc.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1105743914.9222.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 00:33:08 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Iau, 2005-01-13 at 21:50, Andi Kleen wrote: > I could see it as a problem when it happens on a bridge, but why > should it be a problem when some arbitary, nothing to do with X > leaf is temporarily not available? Because X will believe that PCI address range is free and right now in some circumstances older X may want to play with PCI layout itself. Alan