On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 16:04 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 12:34 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:25:41PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:15:16AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > >...
> > > > Changes since 2.6.11-rc1-mm2:
> > > >...
> > > >  bk-i2c.patch
> > > >...
> > > >  Latest versions of various bk trees
> > > >...
> > > 
> > > This causes the following compile error:
> > 
> > Where's that code coming from anyone?  Greg seems to be adding tons of not fully
> > reviewed stuff lately..
> 
> That code was written by me.
> Please provide full error output, since it is compiled successfully
> here.
> 
> Thank you.

Ok, I found following in the archive:
******************************************
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:15:16AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.11-rc1-mm2:
>...
>  bk-i2c.patch
>...
>  Latest versions of various bk trees
>...

This causes the following compile error:

<--  snip  -->

...
  LD      drivers/superio/built-in.o
drivers/superio/sc_acb.o(.text+0x0): In function `sc_write_reg':
: multiple definition of `sc_write_reg'
drivers/superio/sc_gpio.o(.text+0x0): first defined here
drivers/superio/sc_acb.o(.text+0x30): In function `sc_read_reg':
: multiple definition of `sc_read_reg'
drivers/superio/sc_gpio.o(.text+0x30): first defined here
make[2]: *** [drivers/superio/built-in.o] Error 1

<--  snip  -->

The trivial fix for these needlessly global functions is below.

BTW1: pin_test.c is added but completely unused.
BTW2: bk-i2c adds a whole bunch of unused SuperIO EXPORT_SYMBOL's.
      Is usage for them expected very soon or shall I send a patch to 
      remove them?


<--  snip  -->


This patch makes needlessly global functions static fixing a compile 
error if both sc_acb.c and sc_gpio.c are compiled statically into the 
kernel.

*********************************

It is not Greg, but completely my fault and I agree with your changes.
pin_test.c was added as example of how to use SuperIO subsystem, 
it is not supposed to be compiled, it is an example, probably it should 
live in Documentation/superio/example.c

Tahnk you for review.

-- 
        Evgeniy Polyakov

Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski