From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S261267AbVDBUp1@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261267AbVDBUp1 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 2 Apr 2005 15:45:27 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261275AbVDBUp0
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 2 Apr 2005 15:45:26 -0500
Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.57]:41164 "EHLO
	ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S261267AbVDBUod (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 2 Apr 2005 15:44:33 -0500
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.43-00
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>,
       Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>, Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050402203550.GB16230@elte.hu>
References: <20050325145908.GA7146@elte.hu>
	 <200504011419.20964.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <424D9F6A.8080407@cybsft.com>
	 <200504011834.22600.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
	 <20050402051254.GA23786@elte.hu>
	 <1112470675.27149.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <1112472372.27149.23.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20050402203550.GB16230@elte.hu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Kihon Technologies
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 15:44:19 -0500
Message-Id: <1112474659.27149.39.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 22:35 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 14:37 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > 
> > > Here's the bug I get:
> > > 
> > 
> > FYI
> > 
> > For kicks I ran this on 2.6.11-rc2-RT-V0.7.36-02 (I still had it as a 
> > Grub option), and the system just locked up hard.  I just was curious 
> > if this was from a different change. But at least in the latest it 
> > shows output, and not just a hard lockup.
> > 
> > Oh, the bug report was running kernel 2.6.12-rc1-RT-V0.7.43-06.
> 
> ok, so it's not the recent NFS changes.
> 

I may need to take this back. I forgot to open the serial, so it wasn't
accepting input. So it would just appear dead. And the console was
fighting against the RT tasks, so it too would seem to be dead.  I've
reran the test on the latest, but this time I didn't have the NFS
mounted, and it's still running.

-- Steve