From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261527AbVEQOs4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2005 10:48:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261557AbVEQOs4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2005 10:48:56 -0400 Received: from [81.2.110.250] ([81.2.110.250]:46054 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261553AbVEQOsy (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2005 10:48:54 -0400 Subject: Re: Reproducible 2.6.11.9 NFS Kernel Crashing Bug! From: Alan Cox To: Justin Piszcz Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1116341217.21388.145.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 15:47:00 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sad, 2005-05-14 at 14:18, Justin Piszcz wrote: > The mount options I am using are: > rw,hard,intr,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,nfsvers=3 0 0 These are rather extreme r/wsizes especially if you are using UDP - I'm assuming this is TCP ? > Oh, and incase one may think there is a network issue, there is not, > during normal operation when I am not running dd, there are no network > problems, as shown below. I would certainly expect it to be a memory issue. Does it occur with 8192 as the size ?