From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com,
helgehaf@aitel.hist.no
Subject: Re: Ignore disabled ROM resources at setup
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:37:08 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1125376628.11949.51.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050829.212021.43291105.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 21:20 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > So 2.6.13 is being "safe". It allocates the space for the ROM in the
> > resource tables, but it neither enables it nor does it write the
> > (disabled) address out to the device, since both of those actions have
> > been shown to break on PC's. And sadly (or happily, depends on your
> > viewpoint), PC's have a _much_ wider range of hardware, so they are the
> > ones we have to work around.
>
> Actually, I can tell you that it is a known fact that Qlogic ISP
> PCI cards will not respond to I/O and MEM space when you enable
> the ROM. And this behavior exists in quite a few other PCI parts
> as well.
Yes, including Matrox cards.
> So I think the kernel, by not enabling the ROM, is doing the
> right thing here.
It is, the problem is that not only it doesn't enable it, but it also
doesn't write the resource to the BAR, which triggers a bug in
pci_map_rom which then enables the decoding but doesn't update the BAR
with the new address neither.
Note also the, imho totally broken, code in pci_map_rom_copy() which is
supposed to keep a cached copy of the ROM in memory specifically for
these cards to have an easier access afterward (or for sysfs rom file
access to work).
I think that code should have a pointer in pci_dev for the cache instead
of stuffing a kernel virtual address in the middle of the resouce tree.
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-30 4:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200508261859.j7QIxT0I016917@hera.kernel.org>
2005-08-30 2:38 ` Ignore disabled ROM resources at setup Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-30 3:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-30 4:47 ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-30 3:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-30 3:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-30 4:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-30 4:20 ` David S. Miller
2005-08-30 4:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2005-08-30 4:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-30 4:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-30 5:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-30 6:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-31 4:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-30 4:51 ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-30 4:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-30 5:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-30 14:39 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-30 15:29 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-08-30 4:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-30 5:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-30 6:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-30 4:35 ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-30 5:32 ` David S. Miller
2005-08-30 6:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1125376628.11949.51.camel@gaston \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).