From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751296AbVIPVRT (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:17:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751298AbVIPVRT (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:17:19 -0400 Received: from linuxwireless.org.ve.carpathiahost.net ([66.117.45.234]:3537 "EHLO linuxwireless.org.ve.carpathiahost.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751296AbVIPVRT (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:17:19 -0400 Subject: Re: R52 hdaps support? From: Alejandro Bonilla Beeche Reply-To: abonilla@linuxwireless.org To: Keenan Pepper Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <432B34D6.6010904@gmail.com> References: <432B34D6.6010904@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:17:28 -0600 Message-Id: <1126905449.5609.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 17:10 -0400, Keenan Pepper wrote: > I recently splurged on a new ThinkPad R52 (because it was one of the few laptops > in the store with /all/ linux-supported hardware), but the 2.6.14-rc1 kernel I > just compiled says "hdaps: supported laptop not found". > > Looking at the source I notice there's a whitelist of models that goes up to > R51... How badly could it break if I just went ahead and added R52? Should it be > "NORMAL" or "INVERT"? > > Keenan Pepper Hi Keenan, We don't have the X42 nor the R52 in the list of supported laptops. Please send an email to hdaps-devel@lists.sf.net so that we can do something about adding your laptop to the dmi list. Additionally, the X41 should be in the list of supported laptops (Kconfig) Thanks, .Alejandro