From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750761AbVIPXEW (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:04:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750762AbVIPXEW (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:04:22 -0400 Received: from peabody.ximian.com ([130.57.169.10]:4741 "EHLO peabody.ximian.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750761AbVIPXEW (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:04:22 -0400 Subject: Re: R52 hdaps support? From: Robert Love To: Keenan Pepper Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <432B34D6.6010904@gmail.com> References: <432B34D6.6010904@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:04:20 -0400 Message-Id: <1126911860.24266.1.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 17:10 -0400, Keenan Pepper wrote: > I recently splurged on a new ThinkPad R52 (because it was one of the few laptops > in the store with /all/ linux-supported hardware), but the 2.6.14-rc1 kernel I > just compiled says "hdaps: supported laptop not found". > > Looking at the source I notice there's a whitelist of models that goes up to > R51... How badly could it break if I just went ahead and added R52? Should it be > "NORMAL" or "INVERT"? The R52 should work and nothing should break. If it works, I'll add it. As for normal versus inverted: You probably want NORMAL, but you will have to verify it and let me know. You'll know you have the wrong one when the readings are, well, inverted. Robert Love