From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751082AbVI1P4g (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:56:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751023AbVI1P4f (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:56:35 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:52978 "EHLO av.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751079AbVI1P4f (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:56:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] RT: epca_lock to DEFINE_SPINLOCK From: Daniel Walker To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1127900349.2893.19.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> References: <1127845928.4004.24.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> <1127900349.2893.19.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:54:32 -0700 Message-Id: <1127922873.8520.23.camel@c-67-188-6-232.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 11:39 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > this is really ugly though; at minimum a DEFINE_STATIC_SPINLOCK() would > be needed to make this less ugly. Doesn't exists as far as I know .. Shall we make one ? Daniel