From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964969AbVLNVQK (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:16:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964971AbVLNVQK (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:16:10 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:37605 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964969AbVLNVQI (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:16:08 -0500 Subject: Re: irq balancing question From: Arjan van de Ven To: JaniD++ Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <024501c600f2$24e8ccc0$0400a8c0@dcccs> References: <024501c600f2$24e8ccc0$0400a8c0@dcccs> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 22:16:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1134594964.9442.10.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.0.4 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 22:05 +0100, JaniD++ wrote: > Hello, list, > > I try to tune my system with manually irq assigning, but this simple not > works, and i don't know why. :( > I have already read all the documentation in the kernel tree, and search in > google, but i can not find any valuable reason. which chipset? there is a chipset that is broken wrt irq balancing so the kernel refuses to do it there...