From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Ashutosh Naik <ashutosh.naik@gmail.com>,
jesper.juhl@gmail.com, anandhkrishnan@yahoo.co.in,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rth@redhat.com, greg@kroah.com,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, kaos@ocs.com.au
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Prevent overriding of Symbols in the Kernel, avoiding Undefined behaviour
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:15:04 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1134623704.7773.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051214204032.57c4c6ae.akpm@osdl.org>
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 20:40 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Ashutosh Naik <ashutosh.naik@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch ensures that an exported symbol does not already exist in
> > the kernel or in some other module's exported symbol table. This is
> > done by checking the symbol tables for the exported symbol at the time
> > of loading the module. Currently this is done after the relocation of
> > the symbol.
>
> This patch causes weird things to happen on ppc64.
And probably in general:
+ for (i = 0; i < mod->num_syms; i++)
+ if (!__find_symbol(mod->syms[i].name, &owner, &crc, 1)) {
+ name = mod->syms[i].name;
+ ret = -ENOEXEC;
+ goto dup;
__find_symbol returns the value, or 0 on failure. This test is
backwards, as is the one below it.
Rusty.
--
ccontrol: http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/ccontrol
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-15 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-12 12:39 [RFC][PATCH] Prevent overriding of Symbols in the Kernel, avoiding Undefined behaviour Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-12 12:44 ` Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-12 22:25 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-13 8:23 ` Anand H. Krishnan
2005-12-12 19:13 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-12 19:27 ` Richard Henderson
2005-12-12 20:20 ` Greg KH
2005-12-12 20:30 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-12 22:48 ` Alan Cox
2005-12-13 8:03 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-13 14:32 ` Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-12 22:01 ` Rusty Russell
2005-12-13 14:26 ` Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-13 15:28 ` Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-13 16:49 ` [RFC][PATCH] " Jesper Juhl
2005-12-14 2:03 ` Rusty Russell
2005-12-14 4:10 ` Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-14 5:02 ` Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-15 4:40 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-15 5:15 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2005-12-15 5:45 ` Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-14 5:46 ` Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-14 23:02 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1134623704.7773.34.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=anandhkrishnan@yahoo.co.in \
--cc=ashutosh.naik@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).