From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030352AbVLVW7d (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:59:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030354AbVLVW7d (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:59:33 -0500 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:1717 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030352AbVLVW7c (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:59:32 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response From: Trond Myklebust To: Peter Williams Cc: Kyle Moffett , Ingo Molnar , Con Kolivas , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <43AB29B8.7050204@bigpond.net.au> References: <43A8EF87.1080108@bigpond.net.au> <1135145341.7910.17.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <43A8F714.4020406@bigpond.net.au> <1135171280.7958.16.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <962C9716-6F84-477B-8B2A-FA771C21CDE8@mac.com> <1135172453.7958.26.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <43AA0EEA.8070205@bigpond.net.au> <1135289282.9769.2.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <43AB29B8.7050204@bigpond.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:59:23 -0500 Message-Id: <1135292364.9769.58.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.117, required 12, autolearn=disabled, AWL 0.83, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.05, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 09:33 +1100, Peter Williams wrote: > > It still has sod all business being in the NFS code. We don't touch task > > scheduling in the filesystem code. > > How do you explain the use of the TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE flag then? Oh, please... TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE is used to set the task to sleep. It has NOTHING to do with scheduling. Trond