* 2.6.15-rt4-sr1
@ 2006-01-11 20:47 Steven Rostedt
2006-01-11 21:16 ` 2.6.15-rt4-sr1 Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2006-01-11 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: George Anzinger, john stultz, LKML, Thomas Gleixner
I've just uploaded my new maintenance release.
fixes:
- light soft lockup - currently it doesn't detect the light soft lockups
because the counter was being reset in the wrong place. Not sure if
this was done earlier with some other issue. But I needed this fix
to get the low priority lockup to be detected.
- posix_timers deadlock - There's a loop in the posix_timeres code that
is entered if the current process is a higher priority than the
softirqd thread, and it spins until the softirqd thread is finished.
But since the thread is of a higher priority than the softirqd, it
deadlocks.
- read_trylock_rt - added this for cases that have a loop on
read_trylock. Since in RT a read lock is a mutex, a read_trylock
will fail even if the owner has it only for reading. But since
the reads are not protected with irqsaves, this can deadlock when
a high priority process preempts the owner of the lock and spins
till it's released. (this was seen in signal.c: send_group_sigqueue,
there may be others)
Still at the normal location:
http://home.stny.rr.com/rostedt/patches/patch-2.6.15-rt4-sr1
Here is the program that showed all these nice deadlocks ;)
http://www.kihontech.com/tests/rt/timer_stress.c
(Run with -P to get the posix deadlocks)
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.15-rt4-sr1
2006-01-11 20:47 2.6.15-rt4-sr1 Steven Rostedt
@ 2006-01-11 21:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2006-01-11 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, George Anzinger, john stultz, LKML
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 15:47 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> - posix_timers deadlock - There's a loop in the posix_timeres code that
> is entered if the current process is a higher priority than the
> softirqd thread, and it spins until the softirqd thread is finished.
> But since the thread is of a higher priority than the softirqd, it
> deadlocks.
Good catch, thanks
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-11 21:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-11 20:47 2.6.15-rt4-sr1 Steven Rostedt
2006-01-11 21:16 ` 2.6.15-rt4-sr1 Thomas Gleixner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).