From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932214AbWAQRZr (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:25:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932220AbWAQRZq (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:25:46 -0500 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:55938 "EHLO e36.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932214AbWAQRZp (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:25:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.6.16-rc1] TPM: tpm_bios needs securityfs (CONFIG_SECURITY) From: Kylene Jo Hall To: Jerome Pinot Cc: Rui Saraiva , lkml , tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <200601171700.k0HH0rAf000466@comet.localnet> References: <200601171700.k0HH0rAf000466@comet.localnet> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:26:48 -0600 Message-Id: <1137518808.4873.108.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ack'ed-by: Kylene Hall On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 02:00 +0900, Jerome Pinot wrote: > Hi, > > >It seems that "TPM Hardware Support" (CONFIG_TCG_TPM) depends on > >"Enable different security models" (CONFIG_SECURITY). > > This does the trick but your patch formatting is broken. This one > applies cleanly against 2.6.16-rc1. > > from: Rui Saraiva > > tpm_bios (CONFIG_TCG_TPM) depends on securityfs (CONFIG_SECURITY). > > Signed-off-by: Rui Saraiva > Signed-off-by: Jerome Pinot > > --- > diff -Naur a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig 2006-01-17 16:12:37.000000000 +0000 > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig 2006-01-17 16:13:05.000000000 +0000 > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ > > config TCG_TPM > tristate "TPM Hardware Support" > - depends on EXPERIMENTAL > + depends on EXPERIMENTAL && SECURITY > ---help--- > If you have a TPM security chip in your system, which > implements the Trusted Computing Group's specification, > >