From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030215AbWARJFo (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:05:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030214AbWARJFn (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:05:43 -0500 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:57989 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030210AbWARJFm (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:05:42 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Introduction From: Alan Cox To: sander@humilis.net Cc: Michael Tokarev , Ross Vandegrift , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060118081407.GC18945@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060117174531.27739.patches@notabene> <43CCA80B.4020603@tls.msk.ru> <20060117095019.GA27262@localhost.localdomain> <43CCD453.9070900@tls.msk.ru> <20060117160829.GA16606@lug.udel.edu> <43CD3388.9050107@tls.msk.ru> <20060118081407.GC18945@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:03:22 +0000 Message-Id: <1137575002.25819.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mer, 2006-01-18 at 09:14 +0100, Sander wrote: > If the (harddisk internal) remap succeeded, the OS doesn't see the bad > sector at all I believe. True for ATA, in the SCSI case you may be told about the remap having occurred but its a "by the way" type message not an error proper. > If you (the OS) do see a bad sector, the disk couldn't remap, and goes > downhill from there, right? If a hot spare is configured it will be dropped into the configuration at that point.