From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750738AbWATIdz (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:33:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750740AbWATIdz (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:33:55 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:17037 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750738AbWATIdx (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:33:53 -0500 Subject: Re: - add-pselect-ppoll-system-call-implementation-tidy.patch removed from -mm tree From: David Woodhouse To: Jens Axboe Cc: Alan Cox , Stephen Rothwell , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060119155933.GX4213@suse.de> References: <200601190052.k0J0qmKC009977@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <1137648119.30084.94.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060119171708.7f856b42.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1137664692.8471.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060119155933.GX4213@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:33:15 +1300 Message-Id: <1137745995.30084.201.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 16:59 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > I think the CodingStyle suggestion of 80 chars is just fine. I try to > stay within that, and I mostly succeed. The occasional over-the-line is > far better than advocation >> 80 chars per line imho. I agree. It's that "occasional over-the-line" which Andrew is mucking about with in the patch which started this thread; the case where it makes _sense_ to let it go over 80 characters rather than wrapping it. -- dwmw2