From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1750841AbWAUHjE@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1750841AbWAUHjE (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:39:04 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751106AbWAUHjE
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:39:04 -0500
Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:36260 "HELO
	viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S1750841AbWAUHjC (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:39:02 -0500
Subject: Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com>
Cc: Matthew Frost <artusemrys@sbcglobal.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1FA093EB58B02DE48E424157@dhcp-2-206.wgops.com>
References: <20060121031958.98570.qmail@web81905.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	 <1FA093EB58B02DE48E424157@dhcp-2-206.wgops.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:38:59 -0500
Message-Id: <1137829140.3241.141.camel@mindpipe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.4 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 00:22 -0700, Michael Loftis wrote:
> It makes maintenance a real nightmare 
> for atleast one environment in which I maintain production systems 

Why do you keep having to upgrade the kernel on production systems, if
the old kernel does what you need?

Lee