From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1751339AbWAVUhW@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751339AbWAVUhW (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:37:22 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751344AbWAVUhV
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:37:21 -0500
Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:158 "EHLO
	mail.cs.helsinki.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751339AbWAVUhV (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:37:21 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] minix filesystem: Corrected patch
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: "Daniel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aragon=E9s?=" <danarag@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <43D3E96C.2050703@gmail.com>
References: <43D3E96C.2050703@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 22:37:19 +0200
Message-Id: <1137962239.8704.4.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Daniel,

On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 21:22 +0100, Daniel Aragonés wrote:
> Yes, but if I do, is closer to a rewrite of the preexistent code. And
> I think that it not deserves it. Minix is not so important (sorry if
> some one is listening).

Then what's the point of merging your patch to the mainline? We want
clean maintainable code in the kernel so I hope you reconsider
addressing my comments. Thanks.

			Pekka