From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751292AbWBBAPW (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 19:15:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751326AbWBBAPW (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 19:15:22 -0500 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:25220 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751292AbWBBAPV (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 19:15:21 -0500 Subject: Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders From: Alan Cox To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Rene Herman , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <43D114A8.4030900@wolfmountaingroup.com> <43D13B2A.6020504@cs.ubishops.ca> <43D7D05D.7030101@perkel.com> <1138387136.26811.8.camel@localhost> <1138620390.31089.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43DF9D42.7050802@wolfmountaingroup.com> <43DFB0F2.4030901@wolfmountaingroup.com> <43DFDEF9.2030001@keyaccess.nl> <43E0C5E7.6050406@keyaccess.nl> <43E14451.1010100@keyaccess.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:16:30 +0000 Message-Id: <1138839390.5557.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The "license notices" _are_ an integral part of the program. Nothing else > makes sense. They are often in the same files (that's the most common case > by far), and as I showed you, they are often (as in the case of the GPL > license notice itself) actually _linked_in_ into the actual binary itself. The COPYING file is not part of the program. I'm sorry you can't get that into your brain but continually bleating that it doesn't make sense won't actually get you anywhere. Please go and talk to a law student or just let the subject drop.