linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Vacek <neelx@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
	Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
	AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>,
	Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>,
	Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@intel.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>,
	YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>,
	Jia He <jia.he@hxt-semitech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: page_alloc: remain memblock_next_valid_pfn() when CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID is enable
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:26:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <113cb8cf-7c59-4fbb-5ad2-4ae6eeb1193c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACjP9X-zvGa5OQpuJ1bUp+V=_eTOUDLfKkT1sbT84k5zJz=epA@mail.gmail.com>



On 3/28/2018 12:52 AM, Daniel Vacek Wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns
>> where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But it causes
>> possible panic bug. So Daniel Vacek reverted it later.
>>
>> But memblock_next_valid_pfn is valid when CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID is
>> enabled. And as verified by Eugeniu Rosca, arm can benifit from this
>> commit. So remain the memblock_next_valid_pfn.
> It is not dependent on CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID option but on
> arm(64) implementation of pfn_valid() function, IIUC. So it should
> really be moved from generic source file to arm specific location. I'd
> say somewhere close to the pfn_valid() implementation. Such as to
> arch/arm{,64}/mm/ init.c-ish?
>
> --nX
Hi Daniel
I didn't catch the reason why "It is not dependent on 
CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID option but
on arm(64) implementation of pfn_valid() function"? Can you explain more 
about it? Thanks

What's your thought if I changed the codes as followed?
in include/linux/memblock.h
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
extern unsigned long memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn);
#else
#define memblock_next_valid_pfn(pfn) (pfn + 1)
#endif

Cheers,
Jia
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jia He <jia.he@hxt-semitech.com>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/memblock.h |  4 ++++
>>   mm/memblock.c            | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   mm/page_alloc.c          | 11 ++++++++++-
>>   3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
>> index 0257aee..efbbe4b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
>> @@ -203,6 +203,10 @@ void __next_mem_pfn_range(int *idx, int nid, unsigned long *out_start_pfn,
>>               i >= 0; __next_mem_pfn_range(&i, nid, p_start, p_end, p_nid))
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
>> +unsigned long memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn);
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * for_each_free_mem_range - iterate through free memblock areas
>>    * @i: u64 used as loop variable
>> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
>> index ba7c878..bea5a9c 100644
>> --- a/mm/memblock.c
>> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
>> @@ -1102,6 +1102,35 @@ void __init_memblock __next_mem_pfn_range(int *idx, int nid,
>>                  *out_nid = r->nid;
>>   }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
>> +unsigned long __init_memblock memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
>> +{
>> +       struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory;
>> +       unsigned int right = type->cnt;
>> +       unsigned int mid, left = 0;
>> +       phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(++pfn);
>> +
>> +       do {
>> +               mid = (right + left) / 2;
>> +
>> +               if (addr < type->regions[mid].base)
>> +                       right = mid;
>> +               else if (addr >= (type->regions[mid].base +
>> +                                 type->regions[mid].size))
>> +                       left = mid + 1;
>> +               else {
>> +                       /* addr is within the region, so pfn is valid */
>> +                       return pfn;
>> +               }
>> +       } while (left < right);
>> +
>> +       if (right == type->cnt)
>> +               return -1UL;
>> +       else
>> +               return PHYS_PFN(type->regions[right].base);
>> +}
>> +#endif /*CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID*/
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * memblock_set_node - set node ID on memblock regions
>>    * @base: base of area to set node ID for
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index c19f5ac..2a967f7 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -5483,8 +5483,17 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone,
>>                  if (context != MEMMAP_EARLY)
>>                          goto not_early;
>>
>> -               if (!early_pfn_valid(pfn))
>> +               if (!early_pfn_valid(pfn)) {
>> +#if (defined CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK) && (defined CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID)
>> +                       /*
>> +                        * Skip to the pfn preceding the next valid one (or
>> +                        * end_pfn), such that we hit a valid pfn (or end_pfn)
>> +                        * on our next iteration of the loop.
>> +                        */
>> +                       pfn = memblock_next_valid_pfn(pfn) - 1;
>> +#endif
>>                          continue;
>> +               }
>>                  if (!early_pfn_in_nid(pfn, nid))
>>                          continue;
>>                  if (!update_defer_init(pgdat, pfn, end_pfn, &nr_initialised))
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>

-- 
Cheers,
Jia

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-28  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-24 12:24 [PATCH v2 0/5] optimize memblock_next_valid_pfn() and early_pfn_valid() Jia He
2018-03-24 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: page_alloc: remain memblock_next_valid_pfn() when CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID is enable Jia He
2018-03-27 16:52   ` Daniel Vacek
2018-03-28  1:49     ` Jia He
2018-03-28  9:26     ` Jia He [this message]
2018-03-28 10:42       ` Daniel Vacek
2018-03-28  9:13   ` Wei Yang
2018-03-24 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn() Jia He
2018-03-24 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/memblock: introduce memblock_search_pfn_regions() Jia He
2018-03-24 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: introduce pfn_valid_region() Jia He
2018-03-25 14:16   ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-24 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in early_pfn_valid() Jia He
2018-03-25 10:48   ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=113cb8cf-7c59-4fbb-5ad2-4ae6eeb1193c@gmail.com \
    --to=hejianet@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=erosca@de.adit-jv.com \
    --cc=gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jia.he@hxt-semitech.com \
    --cc=kemi.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=neelx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
    --cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
    --cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
    --cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
    --cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).