From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rt17
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:17:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1140650267.6396.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0602221621110.13737-100000@lifa03.phys.au.dk>
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 17:50 +0100, Esben Nielsen wrote:
> I didn't know anyone looked at my patch! I am ofcourse happy about it :-)
Was just delayed due to other work in progress.
> That was why I had _reversed_ the lock ordering relative to normal in the
> original patch: First lock task->pi_lock. Assign lock. Lock
> lock->wait_lock. Then unlock task->pi_lock. Now it is safe to refer to
> lock. To avoid deadlocks I used _raw_spin_trylock() when locking the 2.
> lock.
Stupid me. I messed that one up. Should show up in the next -rt
Thanks
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-22 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-21 15:55 2.6.15-rt17 Ingo Molnar
2006-02-21 16:11 ` 2.6.15-rt17 K.R. Foley
2006-02-21 16:21 ` 2.6.15-rt17 K.R. Foley
2006-02-22 7:51 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Ingo Molnar
2006-02-21 17:16 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Michal Piotrowski
2006-02-21 18:53 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Michal Piotrowski
2006-02-21 20:37 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Thomas Gleixner
2006-02-21 21:15 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Michal Piotrowski
2006-02-22 12:22 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Steven Rostedt
2006-02-22 13:47 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Michal Piotrowski
2006-02-24 6:38 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Ingo Molnar
2006-02-24 7:09 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Steven Rostedt
2006-02-21 17:23 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Timothy R. Chavez
2006-02-21 18:24 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Daniel Walker
2006-02-21 18:46 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Thomas Gleixner
2006-02-22 16:50 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Esben Nielsen
2006-02-22 23:17 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2006-02-25 17:11 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Esben Nielsen
2006-02-25 17:32 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Steven Rostedt
2006-02-25 21:29 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Esben Nielsen
2006-02-25 22:25 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Esben Nielsen
2006-02-26 15:14 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Steven Rostedt
2006-02-26 22:38 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Esben Nielsen
2006-02-27 7:15 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Steven Rostedt
2006-02-23 13:49 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Bill Huey
2006-02-23 13:53 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Ingo Molnar
2006-02-23 14:05 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Bill Huey
2006-02-28 19:21 2.6.15-rt17 Karsten Wiese
2006-02-28 19:43 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1140650267.6396.6.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=simlo@phys.au.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).