From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S266650AbRG1OJ4>; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 10:09:56 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S266667AbRG1OJq>; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 10:09:46 -0400
Received: from [209.226.93.226] ([209.226.93.226]:33778 "EHLO
	roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S266650AbRG1OJf>; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 10:09:35 -0400
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 10:08:05 -0400
From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
cc: "A. Lehmann" <"pcg( Marc)"@goof.com>,
        Joshua Schmidlkofer <menion@srci.iwpsd.org>,
        kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ReiserFS / 2.4.6 / Data Corruption
Message-ID: <114580000.996329285@tiny>
In-Reply-To: <3B626B81.49E25A39@namesys.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.8 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing



On Saturday, July 28, 2001 11:36:33 AM +0400 Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
wrote:

> Alan Cox wrote:
>> 
>> No doubt if Namesys ran test suites all the tail merging bug fiasco and the
>> directory/tree balance races wouldnt have happened.
> Our test suites need much improvement, but we do have them and use them.
> Can you say the same?

He's already described some of the testing they do.  I would suggest there
are better ways to use l-k bandwidth than picking a fight with redhat,
especially on topics that have already been beaten to death.  

Alan, thanks for helping to test the reiserfs patches we've been sending to
in the ac tree, we do appreciate it.

-chris