From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change ll_rw_block() calls in JBD
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:05:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1148051127.5156.28.camel@sisko.sctweedie.blueyonder.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <446DBB31.6010101@bull.net>
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 14:33 +0200, Zoltan Menyhart wrote:
> > For two of the above comments: Under memory pressure data buffers can
> > be written out earlier and then released by __journal_try_to_free_buffer()
> > as they are not dirty any more. The above checks protect us against this.
>
> Assume "bh" has been set free in the mean time.
> Assume it is now used for another transaction (maybe for another file system).
I don't follow --- we already have a refcount to the bh, how can it be
reused? We took the j_list_lock first, then looked up the jh on this
transaction's sync data list, then did the get_bh() without dropping
j_list_lock; so by the time we take the refcount, the j_list_lock
ensures it cannot have come off this transaction. And subsequently, the
refcount prevents reuse.
--Stephen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-19 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-18 8:25 [PATCH] Change ll_rw_block() calls in JBD Zoltan Menyhart
2006-05-18 13:45 ` Jan Kara
2006-05-18 15:11 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-05-18 22:25 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2006-05-19 10:01 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-05-19 12:26 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2006-05-19 1:30 ` Jan Kara
2006-05-19 12:33 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-05-19 15:05 ` Stephen C. Tweedie [this message]
2006-05-19 15:06 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2006-05-24 17:33 ` Jan Kara
2006-05-30 15:36 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-05-30 16:40 ` Jan Kara
2006-05-23 16:01 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-05-24 9:14 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-05-24 17:18 ` Jan Kara
[not found] ` <447F13B3.6050505@bull.net>
[not found] ` <20060601162751.GH26933@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
[not found] ` <44801E16.3040300@bull.net>
[not found] ` <20060602134923.GA1644@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
2006-06-20 16:33 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-21 0:09 ` Jan Kara
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-11 15:52 Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1148051127.5156.28.camel@sisko.sctweedie.blueyonder.co.uk \
--to=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).