linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Kallol Biswas <Kallol_Biswas@pmc-sierra.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Radjendirane Codandaramane 
	<Radjendirane_Codandaramane@pmc-sierra.com>
Subject: RE: process starvation with 2.6 scheduler
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:13:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1150261998.8611.14.camel@Homer.TheSimpsons.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <478F19F21671F04298A2116393EEC3D531CEA4@sjc1exm08.pmc_nt.nt.pmc-sierra.bc.ca>

On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 16:03 -0700, Kallol Biswas wrote:
> It seems that with the priority set to 19 the netserver processes do not starve but still we have unfair scheduling issue. The netperf clients do not timeout now but one of the servers runs much less than the other. It seems that thorough understanding of scheduling algorithm is essential at this point.

Are the clients all on one box?

	-Mike


  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-14  5:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-13 23:03 process starvation with 2.6 scheduler Kallol Biswas
2006-06-14  5:13 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-14 17:56 Kallol Biswas
2006-06-14 19:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-06 21:58 Kallol Biswas
2006-06-07  5:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-06 18:51 Kallol Biswas
2006-06-06 17:55 Kallol Biswas
2006-06-05 23:09 Kallol Biswas
2006-06-05 21:30 Kallol Biswas
2006-06-05 20:46 Kallol Biswas
2006-06-05 20:36 Kallol Biswas
2006-06-05 19:48 Kallol Biswas
2006-06-06  8:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-06-06 16:55   ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1150261998.8611.14.camel@Homer.TheSimpsons.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=Kallol_Biswas@pmc-sierra.com \
    --cc=Radjendirane_Codandaramane@pmc-sierra.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).