From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964803AbWGYQ6B (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:58:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964800AbWGYQ5g (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:57:36 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:42891 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932480AbWGYQ5a (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:57:30 -0400 Subject: Re: automated test? (was Re: Linux 2.6.17.7) From: Arjan van de Ven To: David Lang Cc: Andrew de Quincey , Arnaud Patard , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <20060725034247.GA5837@kroah.com> <200607251123.40549.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:56:58 +0200 Message-Id: <1153846619.8932.36.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 09:47 -0700, David Lang wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Andrew de Quincey wrote: > > > On Tuesday 25 July 2006 10:55, Arnaud Patard wrote: > >> Greg KH writes: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >>> We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.17.7 kernel. > >> > >> Sorry, but doesn't compile if DVB_BUDGET_AV is set :( > >> > >>> Andrew de Quincey: > >>> v4l/dvb: Fix budget-av frontend detection > > > > > > In fact it is just this patch causing the problem: > > > Sorry, I had so much work going on in that area I must have diffed the wrong > > kernel when I created this patch. :( > > is it reasonable to have an aotomated test figure out what config options are > relavent to a patch (or patchset) and test compile all the combinations to catch > this sort of mistake? well you can do such a thing withing statistical bounds; however... if the patch already is in -git (as is -stable policy normally).. it should have been found there already... -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com