From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1425517AbWLHOQK (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:16:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760742AbWLHOQK (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:16:10 -0500 Received: from zombie.ncsc.mil ([144.51.88.131]:48905 "EHLO jazzdrum.ncsc.mil" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760739AbWLHOQI (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:16:08 -0500 Subject: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.20 From: Stephen Smalley To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20061204204024.2401148d.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20061204204024.2401148d.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: National Security Agency Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:09:34 -0500 Message-Id: <1165586974.12263.190.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-2.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 20:40 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > mprotect-patch-for-use-by-slim.patch > integrity-service-api-and-dummy-provider.patch > integrity-service-api-and-dummy-provider-cleanup-use-of-configh.patch > integrity-service-api-and-dummy-provider-compilation-warning-fix.patch > slim-main-patch.patch > slim-main-patch-socket_post_create-hook-return-code.patch > slim-main-patch-misc-cleanups-requested-at-inclusion-time.patch > slim-main-patch-handle-failure-to-register.patch > slim-main-patch-fix-bug-with-mm_users-usage.patch > slim-main-patch-security-slim-slm_mainc-make-2-functions-static.patch > slim-secfs-patch.patch > slim-secfs-patch-slim-correct-use-of-snprintf.patch > slim-secfs-patch-cleanup-use-of-configh.patch > slim-make-and-config-stuff.patch > slim-make-and-config-stuff-makefile-fix.patch > slim-debug-output.patch > slim-fix-security-issue-with-the-task_post_setuid-hook.patch > slim-secfs-inode-i_private-build-fix.patch > slim-documentation.patch > fdtable-make-fdarray-and-fdsets-equal-in-size-slim.patch > > Shall hold in -mm. Why? I haven't seen any evidence that prior review comments have been addressed so far, and a fresh patch set would be beneficial anyway to facilitate full review of the updated code and to allow them to fix their patch descriptions as well (as they were wrong in some instances, describing older versions of the code). -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency