From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750923AbXCQO6Y (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 10:58:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753254AbXCQO6Y (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 10:58:24 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:45145 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750923AbXCQO6X (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 10:58:23 -0400 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+JRBkcxeOJNGfvFwpYbcFbb72GtJWhnc8nVKBV9v Agt54Q9xAin6KN Subject: Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31 From: Mike Galbraith To: Mark Glines Cc: David Lang , Al Boldi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ck@vds.kolivas.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Nicholas Miell In-Reply-To: <20070317075407.3fb1e2eb@chirp> References: <200703042335.26785.a1426z@gawab.com> <200703170040.48316.kernel@kolivas.org> <1174059299.7886.25.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <200703170813.32594.kernel@kolivas.org> <1174084207.7009.9.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <1174105443.3144.4.camel@entropy> <1174110965.7911.44.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <1174112768.3144.8.camel@entropy> <20070317074506.GA13685@elte.hu> <1174121187.8647.20.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <20070317070906.1b84318c@chirp> <1174142021.7614.10.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <20070317075407.3fb1e2eb@chirp> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 15:58:20 +0100 Message-Id: <1174143500.7614.21.camel@Homer.simpson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 07:54 -0700, Mark Glines wrote: > On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 15:33:41 +0100 > Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ P > > > > COMMAND 6599 root 26 0 174m 30m 8028 R 51 3.1 > > > > 7:08.70 0 Xorg > > > > > > > This is a snippet from a hacked up by me version of RSDL.30, not > > stock. > > Oops. Thanks, sorry about my confusion. What does it look like without > your patches? (I'm not sure if you've already sent this... I can't > find any in the list archives.) If you go to the beginning of the thread, I described the test load. (I don't want to rehash... 'nuff turbulence) -Mike