From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965673AbXCSGVz (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 02:21:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965672AbXCSGVz (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 02:21:55 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:41962 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S965673AbXCSGVz (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 02:21:55 -0400 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+H2HgGlACHyFcs/mlo8VcLAnNHBsAWEtJpvnLTX1 fp6v3/6+jcTISJ Subject: RE: RSDL v0.31 From: Mike Galbraith To: davids@webmaster.com Cc: "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:21:47 +0100 Message-Id: <1174285307.7498.15.camel@Homer.simpson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 19:27 -0700, David Schwartz wrote: > > Wrong. I call a good job giving a _preference_ to the desktop. I call > > rigid fairness impractical for the desktop, and a denial of reality. > > Assuming you *want* that. It's possible that the desktop may not be > particularly important and the machine may be doing much more important > server work with critical latency issues. So if you want that, you have to > ask for it. Amusing argument ;-) I doubt that there are many admins ripping and encoding CDs on their employers critical production servers. > Again, your complaint is that the other server gave you what you wanted even > when you didn't ask for it. That's great for you but totally sucks for the > majority of other people who want something else. I don't presume to speak for the majority... -Mike