From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753248AbXCVHPG (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 03:15:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753247AbXCVHPF (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 03:15:05 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:40330 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753248AbXCVHPD (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 03:15:03 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+1znAVYyC1sjCNVtA22eiBmZnuhFdojTClXhj0cw 6mYYSr0UE5bpXy Subject: Re: RSDL v0.31 From: Mike Galbraith To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Paolo Ornati , Linus Torvalds , Xavier Bestel , Mark Lord , Al Boldi , Con Kolivas , ck@vds.kolivas.org, Serge Belyshev , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Miell , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20070322044935.GY943@1wt.eu> References: <45FEB54A.3040602@rtr.ca> <1174321617.30876.69.camel@frg-rhel40-em64t-04> <45FEBBF5.9060002@rtr.ca> <1174322580.30876.72.camel@frg-rhel40-em64t-04> <20070320061152.GW943@1wt.eu> <1174377787.9756.21.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <1174489064.5379.42.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <20070321161147.54c7a727@localhost> <1174496853.6441.2.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <20070322044935.GY943@1wt.eu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:14:59 +0100 Message-Id: <1174547699.7414.136.camel@Homer.simpson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 05:49 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Mike, if you need my old scheddos, I can resend it to you as well as to > any people working on the scheduler and asking for it. Although trivial, > I'm a bit reluctant to publish it to the whole world because I suspect > that distros based on older kernels are still vulnerable and the fixes > may not be easy. Anyway, it has absolutely no effect on non-interactive > schedulers. Sure. I'm really irked that I lost most of my collection of posted exploits. I prefer to test with the same widget the poster tested with. (in this particular case, it's not _very_ important which one i test with, i'm exploring my RSDL troubles with sleepers in general... duration matters though, need to be fairly short/short burn.) -Mike