linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
To: yangxingwu <xingwu.yang@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	kadlec@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	coreteam@netfilter.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipvs: Fix reuse connection if RS weight is 0
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:44:28 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1190ef60-3ad9-119e-5336-1c62522aec81@ssi.bg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+7U5JsSuwqP7eHj1tMHfsb+EemwrhZEJ2b944LFWTroxAnQRQ@mail.gmail.com>


	Hello,

On Tue, 26 Oct 2021, yangxingwu wrote:

> thanks julian
> 
> What happens in this situation is that if we set the wait of the
> realserver to 0 and do NOT remove the weight zero realserver with
> sysctl settings (conn_reuse_mode == 0 && expire_nodest_conn == 1), and
> the client reuses its source ports, the kernel will constantly
> reuse connections and send the traffic to the weight 0 realserver.

	Yes, this is expected when conn_reuse_mode=0.

> you may check the details from
> https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/81775

	What happens if you try conn_reuse_mode=1? The
one-second delay in previous kernels should be corrected with

commit f0a5e4d7a594e0fe237d3dfafb069bb82f80f42f
Date:   Wed Jul 1 18:17:19 2020 +0300

    ipvs: allow connection reuse for unconfirmed conntrack

> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 2:12 AM Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Oct 2021, yangxingwu wrote:
> >
> > > Since commit dc7b3eb900aa ("ipvs: Fix reuse connection if real server is
> > > dead"), new connections to dead servers are redistributed immediately to
> > > new servers.
> > >
> > > Then commit d752c3645717 ("ipvs: allow rescheduling of new connections when
> > > port reuse is detected") disable expire_nodest_conn if conn_reuse_mode is
> > > 0. And new connection may be distributed to a real server with weight 0.
> >
> >         Your change does not look correct to me. At the time
> > expire_nodest_conn was created, it was not checked when
> > weight is 0. At different places different terms are used
> > but in short, we have two independent states for real server:
> >
> > - inhibited: weight=0 and no new connections should be served,
> >         packets for existing connections can be routed to server
> >         if it is still available and packets are not dropped
> >         by expire_nodest_conn.
> >         The new feature is that port reuse detection can
> >         redirect the new TCP connection into a new IPVS conn and
> >         to expire the existing cp/ct.
> >
> > - unavailable (!IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE): server is removed,
> >         can be temporary, drop traffic for existing connections
> >         but on expire_nodest_conn we can select different server
> >
> >         The new conn_reuse_mode flag allows port reuse to
> > be detected. Only then expire_nodest_conn has the
> > opportunity with commit dc7b3eb900aa to check weight=0
> > and to consider the old traffic as finished. If a new
> > server is selected, any retrans from previous connection
> > would be considered as part from the new connection. It
> > is a rapid way to switch server without checking with
> > is_new_conn_expected() because we can not have many
> > conns/conntracks to different servers.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-26  5:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-25 11:59 [PATCH] ipvs: Fix reuse connection if RS weight is 0 yangxingwu
2021-10-25 18:12 ` Julian Anastasov
2021-10-26  2:54   ` yangxingwu
2021-10-26  5:44     ` Julian Anastasov [this message]
2021-10-26  6:13       ` yangxingwu
2021-10-27  1:43         ` yangxingwu
2021-10-27 21:09           ` Julian Anastasov
2021-10-28  2:50             ` yangxingwu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1190ef60-3ad9-119e-5336-1c62522aec81@ssi.bg \
    --to=ja@ssi.bg \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=xingwu.yang@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).