From: Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>, Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Correct types for mod_devicetable.h (was: Re: m68k build failure)
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 01:43:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1197182610.12636.11.camel@perihelion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071208215811.GD20441@stusta.de>
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 22:58 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:02:19PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Sunday 02 December 2007 22:22:31 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > > > Yeah, that could work. Have a header with stuff like this:
> > > >
> > > > typedef u16 __attribute__((aligned(2))) aligned_u16;
> > > > typedef u32 __attribute__((aligned(4))) aligned_u32;
> > >
> > > I gave it a try:
> >
> > This seems to turn a molehill into a mountain.
> >
> > We can change that mod_devicetable.h at any time; it's not supposed to be a
> > userspace API (the kernel build system doesn't count).
>
> module-init-tools is userspace and not shipped as part of the kernel
> build system...
Not really an issue, so long as I get a head's up, but we'll force users
to upgrade so let's be sure we want to do this/everyone's happy.
Jon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-09 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-28 6:07 m68k build failure Andrew Morton
2007-11-28 8:48 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-11-28 9:00 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-28 9:28 ` Al Viro
2007-11-28 12:29 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-11-28 12:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-12-01 20:56 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-12-02 11:22 ` Correct types for mod_devicetable.h (was: Re: m68k build failure) Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-12-03 10:02 ` Rusty Russell
2007-12-08 21:58 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-09 6:43 ` Jon Masters [this message]
2007-12-09 17:10 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-12-12 1:34 ` Rusty Russell
2007-12-09 17:08 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-12-10 18:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-10 19:12 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-11-29 21:19 ` m68k build failure Andrew Morton
2007-11-30 17:55 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-28 9:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-11-28 9:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-11-28 10:01 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-11-28 10:07 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-28 10:23 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-11-28 9:58 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1197182610.12636.11.camel@perihelion \
--to=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=drzeus@drzeus.cx \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).