linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: "Wang, Jiada" <jiada_wang@mentor.com>,
	nick@shmanahar.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, erosca@de.adit-jv.com,
	Andrew_Gabbasov@mentor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - wake mXT1386 from deep-sleep mode
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 22:49:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11e0052b-ae7a-71bc-1b28-9d5b42acfd11@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0d8dffe-be52-992e-af2b-020d4b159747@mentor.com>

18.09.2020 18:55, Wang, Jiada пишет:
...
>>>   +static void mxt_wake(struct mxt_data *data)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
>>> +    struct device *dev = &data->client->dev;
>>> +    struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>>> +    union i2c_smbus_data dummy;
>>> +
>>> +    if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "atmel,mXT1386"))
>>> +        return;
>> I'm not sure whether you misses the previous answers from Dmitry
>> Torokhov and Rob Herring, but they suggested to add a new device-tree
>> property which should specify the atmel,wakeup-method.
>>
> I think Rob Herring prefers for the compatible solution than property.

Actually, seems you're right. But I'm not sure now whether he just made
a typo, because it's actually a board-specific option.

It could be more preferred to skip the i2c_smbus_xfer() for the NONE
variant, but it also should be harmless in practice. I guess we indeed
could keep the current variant of yours patch and then add a clarifying
comment to the commit message and to the code, telling that
i2c_smbus_xfer() is harmless in a case of the hardwired WAKE-LINE.

>> There are 3 possible variants:
>>
>>    - NONE
>>    - GPIO
>>    - I2C-SCL
>>
>> Hence we should bail out from mxt_wake() if method is set to NONE or
>> GPIO.
>>
> for "GPIO", we still need 25 ms sleep. but rather than a dummy read,
> WAKE line need to be asserted before sleep.

Correct, I just meant to bail out because GPIO is currently unsupported.

...
>>>   static int mxt_initialize(struct mxt_data *data)
>>>   {
>>>       struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
>>>       int recovery_attempts = 0;
>>>       int error;
>>>   +    mxt_wake(data);
>>> +
>>>       while (1) {
>>
>> I assume the mxt_wake() should be placed here, since there is a 3
>> seconds timeout in the end of the while-loop, meaning that device may
>> get back into deep-sleep on a retry.
>>
> Can you elaborate a little more why exit from bootload mode after sleep
> for 3 second could enter deep-sleep mode.

The loop attempts to exit from bootload mode and then I suppose
mxt_read_info_block() may fail if I2C "accidentally" fails, hence the
deep-sleep mode still will be enabled on a retry.

The datasheet says that there are 2 seconds since the time of the last
I2C access before TS is put back into auto-sleep if deep-sleep mode is
enabled. The wait-loop has msleep(3000).

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-19 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-18 12:56 [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: input: atmel: add compatible for mXT1386 Jiada Wang
2020-09-18 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - wake mXT1386 from deep-sleep mode Jiada Wang
2020-09-18 13:32   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-09-18 15:55     ` Wang, Jiada
2020-09-19 19:49       ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2020-09-20  5:28         ` Wang, Jiada
2020-09-20  6:02           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2020-09-20 13:13             ` Wang, Jiada
2020-09-20 14:21               ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-09-20 14:36                 ` Wang, Jiada
2020-09-20 15:49                   ` Dmitry Osipenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11e0052b-ae7a-71bc-1b28-9d5b42acfd11@gmail.com \
    --to=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=Andrew_Gabbasov@mentor.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=erosca@de.adit-jv.com \
    --cc=jiada_wang@mentor.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nick@shmanahar.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).