From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61F6C18E5B for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19FD20658 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732705AbgCPVaI (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 17:30:08 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:6232 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732567AbgCPVaI (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 17:30:08 -0400 IronPort-SDR: +Dc5zwygM1wkp0rLJA0xqpbWtEwvAHI/d5SWbG8gpU/Xzja9MMCeXtPzYVLP/Uz3yeGewW9vxV NNBPjKjFbn6Q== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Mar 2020 14:30:07 -0700 IronPort-SDR: AIMDdKRJtMZydTFlW4tt9zT6zaAKwOMzVPMm2h5MaPSCZKm4+n+PU9YNAwbg2et54nQCTOpvaI 4G2Q/NqGsB+Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,561,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="244273851" Received: from oaizenbe-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.254.149.199]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Mar 2020 14:29:52 -0700 Message-ID: <11e9de481f37a5160fe0d82dcbd7beb9d100748d.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v28 21/22] x86/vdso: Implement a vDSO for Intel SGX enclave call From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Nathaniel McCallum , Jethro Beekman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, "Christopherson, Sean J" , Neil Horman , "Huang, Haitao" , andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, "Svahn, Kai" , bp@alien8.de, Josh Triplett , luto@kernel.org, kai.huang@intel.com, David Rientjes , cedric.xing@intel.com, Patrick Uiterwijk , Andy Lutomirski , Connor Kuehl , Harald Hoyer , Lily Sturmann Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 23:29:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20d3cc40d559a854a7984543acdacb61a2d51b8d.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20200303233609.713348-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20200303233609.713348-22-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20200315012523.GC208715@linux.intel.com> <7f9f2efe-e9af-44da-6719-040600f5b351@fortanix.com> <20d3cc40d559a854a7984543acdacb61a2d51b8d.camel@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.35.92-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 23:27 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 09:57 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > > For the vDSO, only marginally. I'm counting +4,-2 instructions in my > > suggestions. For the wrapper, things become significantly simpler. > > Simpler is not a quality that has very high importance here except > when it comes to vDSO. > > At least it is not enough to change to vDSO. What else? ~~ the In any case, where I stand is that the vDSO implementation itself is exactly how it should be. The process to get it to this form was tedious. Now we have a form that the known userbase can live with. The documentation sucks, agreed. I think by fixing that this would be a wholelot better. /Jarkko