From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757012AbYHOWgS (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:36:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751721AbYHOWgI (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:36:08 -0400 Received: from mail.crca.org.au ([67.207.131.56]:50345 "EHLO crca.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751600AbYHOWgI (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:36:08 -0400 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Subject: Re: PM_TRACE is no longer experimental From: Nigel Cunningham To: Tilman Schmidt Cc: Pavel Machek , Andrew Morton , kernel list , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Trivial patch monkey In-Reply-To: <48A5B8C8.6040504@imap.cc> References: <20080814151833.GA23300@elf.ucw.cz> <48A5B8C8.6040504@imap.cc> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Christian Reformed Churches of Australia Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 08:34:29 +1000 Message-Id: <1218839669.9654.45.camel@nigel-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi. On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 19:11 +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > On 14.08.2008 17:18 Pavel Machek wrote: > > PM_TRACE is stable for quite long. I don't think it needs to depend on > > experimental. > > It might be stable, but its effect of trashing the RTC makes it unsuitable > for non-experimental use. Therefore I'd prefer the dependency be kept. I think you're confusing 'experimental' and 'debugging'. You certainly wouldn't want to use it routinely, but that doesn't mean it's still an experimental feature. Regards, Nigel