From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753504AbYIQFB3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:01:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750730AbYIQFBV (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:01:21 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:48647 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751283AbYIQFBU (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:01:20 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1856cE5FWA5LVibZ8a8lON0RmHQ4VjurZjIVmt9OI SBBb8CvpPq1nel Subject: Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 From: Mike Galbraith To: Ilpo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= Cc: Christoph Lameter , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1221626391.5043.13.camel@marge.simson.net> References: <48CAE7A0.8000004@linux-foundation.org> <1221306287.5213.111.camel@marge.simson.net> <48CD1D25.9080301@linux-foundation.org> <1221421907.4597.24.camel@marge.simson.net> <1221475440.4784.39.camel@marge.simson.net> <1221568105.5020.17.camel@marge.simson.net> <1221626391.5043.13.camel@marge.simson.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:01:16 +0200 Message-Id: <1221627676.5125.3.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 06:40 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 17:07 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > One additional sanity check could be to rebase security 6f0f0fd4963 on top > > of the c142bda458a and then see if bisection among those security commits > > on top yields to the the same result... Though I doubt it can change much > > because there was not that much relevant non-security things in the merge > > in question. > > I'm not a master of git-foo, so that is not an option. However, a dinky > bisection c142bda4..847106f very clearly says... > > marge:..kernel/linux-2.6.27.git # git bisect bad > 6f0f0fd496333777d53daff21a4e3b28c4d03a6d is first bad commit > commit 6f0f0fd496333777d53daff21a4e3b28c4d03a6d > Author: James Morris > Date: Thu Jul 10 17:02:07 2008 +0900 > > security: remove register_security hook > > The register security hook is no longer required, as the capability > module is always registered. LSMs wishing to stack capability as > a secondary module should do so explicitly. > > Signed-off-by: James Morris > Acked-by: Stephen Smalley > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > :040000 040000 0177ef46d305e51e27bfcc4350a40577f8ba8d3d 64b64c10a424df4539653a8ee34f1a2329300931 M include > :040000 040000 e318891e514de674fd064f6bfad70d5633b1aff1 0dbb38d5aa7fc3e4b2e09dc65796ce7cd5faeb26 M security Which is high grade horse-pookey. -Mike