From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759097AbZBLOmJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:42:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756744AbZBLOlz (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:41:55 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:58725 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756806AbZBLOly (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:41:54 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] rt: res_counter fix, v2 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , rt-users , Steven Rostedt , Carsten Emde , Clark Williams In-Reply-To: <20090212142806.GA5865@nowhere> References: <20090212005032.GA4788@nowhere> <20090212021257.GB4697@nowhere> <20090212101650.GA1096@elte.hu> <20090212102113.GA10031@elte.hu> <20090212142806.GA5865@nowhere> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:41:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1234449701.10603.10.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.25.90 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 15:28 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > [ 45.228589] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [] copy_process+0x68d/0x1500 > > [ 45.228602] softirqs last enabled at (0): [] copy_process+0x68d/0x1500 > > > The reason for which I wanted to send an irqsoff trace is that the above lines are false. copy_process() has: #endif p->hardirq_enable_ip = 0; p->hardirq_enable_event = 0; p->hardirq_disable_ip = _THIS_IP_; p->hardirq_disable_event = 0; p->softirqs_enabled = 1; p->softirq_enable_ip = _THIS_IP_; p->softirq_enable_event = 0; p->softirq_disable_ip = 0; p->softirq_disable_event = 0; p->hardirq_context = 0; p->softirq_context = 0; #endif the sequence count of 0 basically tells you it hasn't been set yet.