From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755460AbZBXIs5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:48:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754959AbZBXIsp (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:48:45 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:57054 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754942AbZBXIso (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:48:44 -0500 Subject: Re: [Bug #12618] hackbench [pthread mode] regression with 2.6.29-rc3 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Ingo Molnar , "Zhang, Yanmin" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:48:16 +0100 Message-Id: <1235465296.15790.0.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 22:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12618 > Subject : hackbench [pthread mode] regression with 2.6.29-rc3 > Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin > Date : 2009-02-01 7:30 (23 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=490dea45d00f01847ebebd007685d564aaf2cd98 > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123347347726527&w=4 > Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123383366122146&w=4 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123383366222152&w=4 I thought this was all upstream by now, Yanmin, are we still seeing some badness?