From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/37] x86: print bootmem free before pci_iommu_alloc and free_all_bootmem -v2
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:06:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1263611228-6751-10-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263611228-6751-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
so we could double check if we have enough low pages later
-v2: fix errors checkpatch.pl reported
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 2 +
include/linux/bootmem.h | 2 +
mm/bootmem.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
index 1ea79ad..f9530eb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -654,6 +654,8 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
long codesize, reservedpages, datasize, initsize;
unsigned long absent_pages;
+ print_bootmem_free();
+
pci_iommu_alloc();
/* clear_bss() already clear the empty_zero_page */
diff --git a/include/linux/bootmem.h b/include/linux/bootmem.h
index b10ec49..3446bed 100644
--- a/include/linux/bootmem.h
+++ b/include/linux/bootmem.h
@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ extern void free_bootmem_node(pg_data_t *pgdat,
extern void free_bootmem(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size);
extern void free_bootmem_late(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size);
+void print_bootmem_free(void);
+
/*
* Flags for reserve_bootmem (also if CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BOOTMEM_NODE,
* the architecture-specific code should honor this).
diff --git a/mm/bootmem.c b/mm/bootmem.c
index 7d14868..eec89ed 100644
--- a/mm/bootmem.c
+++ b/mm/bootmem.c
@@ -267,6 +267,98 @@ static void __init __free(bootmem_data_t *bdata,
BUG();
}
+static void __init print_all_bootmem_free_core(bootmem_data_t *bdata)
+{
+ int aligned;
+ unsigned long *map;
+ unsigned long start, end, count = 0;
+ unsigned long free_start = -1UL, free_end = 0;
+
+ if (!bdata->node_bootmem_map)
+ return;
+
+ start = bdata->node_min_pfn;
+ end = bdata->node_low_pfn;
+
+ /*
+ * If the start is aligned to the machines wordsize, we might
+ * be able to count it in bulks of that order.
+ */
+ aligned = !(start & (BITS_PER_LONG - 1));
+
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "nid=%td start=0x%010lx end=0x%010lx aligned=%d\n",
+ bdata - bootmem_node_data, start, end, aligned);
+ map = bdata->node_bootmem_map;
+
+ while (start < end) {
+ unsigned long idx, vec;
+
+ idx = start - bdata->node_min_pfn;
+ vec = ~map[idx / BITS_PER_LONG];
+
+ if (aligned && vec == ~0UL && start + BITS_PER_LONG < end) {
+ if (free_start == -1UL) {
+ free_start = idx;
+ free_end = free_start + BITS_PER_LONG;
+ } else {
+ if (free_end == idx) {
+ free_end += BITS_PER_LONG;
+ } else {
+ /* there is gap, print old */
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG " free [0x%010lx - 0x%010lx]\n",
+ free_start + bdata->node_min_pfn,
+ free_end + bdata->node_min_pfn);
+ free_start = idx;
+ free_end = idx + BITS_PER_LONG;
+ }
+ }
+ count += BITS_PER_LONG;
+ } else {
+ unsigned long off = 0;
+
+ while (vec && off < BITS_PER_LONG) {
+ if (vec & 1) {
+ if (free_start == -1UL) {
+ free_start = idx + off;
+ free_end = free_start + 1;
+ } else {
+ if (free_end == (idx + off)) {
+ free_end++;
+ } else {
+ /* there is gap, print old */
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG " free [0x%010lx - 0x%010lx]\n",
+ free_start + bdata->node_min_pfn,
+ free_end + bdata->node_min_pfn);
+ free_start = idx + off;
+ free_end = free_start + 1;
+ }
+ }
+ count++;
+ }
+ vec >>= 1;
+ off++;
+ }
+ }
+ start += BITS_PER_LONG;
+ }
+
+ /* last one */
+ if (free_start != -1UL)
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG " free [0x%010lx - 0x%010lx]\n",
+ free_start + bdata->node_min_pfn,
+ free_end + bdata->node_min_pfn);
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG " total free 0x%010lx\n", count);
+}
+
+void __init print_bootmem_free(void)
+{
+ bootmem_data_t *bdata;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(bdata, &bdata_list, list) {
+ print_all_bootmem_free_core(bdata);
+ }
+}
+
static int __init __reserve(bootmem_data_t *bdata, unsigned long sidx,
unsigned long eidx, int flags)
{
--
1.6.4.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-16 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-16 3:06 [PATCH -v4 0/37] x86: not use bootmem for x86 Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 01/37] x86: move range related operation to one file Yinghai Lu
2010-01-19 16:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-20 19:37 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-20 19:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-20 19:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 02/37] x86: check range in update range Yinghai Lu
2010-01-19 16:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-20 19:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-20 19:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-20 19:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 03/37] x86/pci: use u64 instead of size_t in amd_bus.c Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 04/37] x86/pci: add cap_resource Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 05/37] x86/pci: enable pci root res read out for 32bit too Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 06/37] x86: call early_res_to_bootmem one time Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 07/37] x86: introduce max_early_res and early_res_count Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 08/37] x86: dynamic increase early_res array size Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 10/37] x86: make early_node_mem get mem > 4g if possible Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 11/37] x86: only call dma32_reserve_bootmem 64bit !CONFIG_NUMA Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 12/37] x86: make 64 bit use early_res instead of bootmem before slab Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 13/37] sparsemem: put usemap for one node together Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 14/37] sparsemem: put mem map " Yinghai Lu
2010-01-19 17:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 15/37] x86: change range end to start+size Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 16/37] x86: move bios page reserve early to head32/64.c Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 17/37] x86: seperate early_res related code from e820.c Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 18/37] x86: add find_early_area_size Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 19/37] x86: move back find_e820_area to e820.c Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 20/37] early_res: enhance check_and_double_early_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 21/37] x86: make 32bit support NO_BOOTMEM Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 22/37] move round_up/down to kernel.h Yinghai Lu
2010-01-19 17:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-20 20:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-20 20:28 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-20 20:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-20 21:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-26 0:40 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-26 0:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-26 1:26 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 23/37] x86: add find_fw_memmap_area Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 24/37] core: move early_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 25/37] ram_buffer_extend_print Yinghai Lu
2010-01-19 17:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 26/37] x86: remove bios data range from e820 Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 27/37] irq: remove not need bootmem code Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:06 ` [PATCH 28/37] radix: move radix init early Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:07 ` [PATCH 29/37] sparseirq: change irq_desc_ptrs to static Yinghai Lu
2010-01-19 18:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-20 19:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:07 ` [PATCH 30/37] sparseirq: use radix_tree instead of ptrs array Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:07 ` [PATCH 31/37] x86: remove arch_probe_nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:07 ` [PATCH 32/37] x86, apic: Use logical flat on intel with <= 8 logical cpus Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:07 ` [PATCH 33/37] use nr_cpus= to set nr_cpu_ids early Yinghai Lu
2010-01-19 18:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-20 19:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:07 ` [PATCH 34/37] x86: using logical flat for amd cpu too Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:07 ` [PATCH 35/37] x86: according to nr_cpu_ids to decide if need to leave logical flat Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:07 ` [PATCH 36/37] x86: make 32bit apic flat to physflat switch like 64bit Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:07 ` [PATCH 37/37] x86: use num_processors for possible cpus Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1263611228-6751-10-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).