From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756799Ab3FSNyt (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:54:49 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:57630 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756427Ab3FSNys (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:54:48 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Robin Holt Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Russell King , Russ Anderson , "H. Peter Anvin" , Guan Xuetao , Linux Kernel Mailing List , the arch/x86 maintainers , Arm Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH -v11 resend 10/11] arm, change reboot_mode to use enum reboot_mode Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:52:02 +0200 Message-ID: <12642293.RmlRtOVM54@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.3 (Linux/3.9.0-2-generic; KDE/4.10.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4169120.1k31YLDD12@wuerfel> References: <1370519244-49918-1-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> <1370519244-49918-11-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> <4169120.1k31YLDD12@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:fT1dbXndlqzyRGPLbQ585VKwT5L6qfjWEvK+RVE2oNO cOVsTK//uBDVLEZRYyFoNq/2iPfgsQVkWujJu7BbQ4Tss2nzAs 3O5POZR4bMhQ2id+n7PoB2ejQ/buZiA5tTWgWhN6Vf7wqgSA4Q /VsiiZAoIr5GpQ4ygtRVjVo7+YAyHQtBQNFjvCx4NiuO1XY0bK mY9r46q+FyVCHGVQQvYafKqQsnhzSIPA9pAuSiA+aN5FDW50pB d9FfQWjmwzRufbiSeU2yk75xh24z4SLiE192IqakgZNjLkA6Hz sjTb0qPOcvdj5WWLssRpQbHWSm3j1GfagediJZpEWPFmy1SG89 At2PehvTlIM8AiGIuS24= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 19 June 2013 12:58:10 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 06 June 2013 06:47:23 Robin Holt wrote: > > Preparing to move the parsing of reboot= to generic kernel code > > forces the change in reboot_mode handling to use the enum. > > > > Signed-off-by: Robin Holt > > To: Andrew Morton > > Cc: Russell King > > Cc: Russ Anderson > > Cc: Robin Holt > > Cc: H. Peter Anvin > > Cc: Guan Xuetao > > Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List > > Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers > > Cc: Arm Mailing List > > Acked-by: Russell King > > Should we merge this through the arm-soc tree? > > I'm getting a few conflicts with new platforms getting added > using the old interface. Hmm, I realized after sending it that this patch depends on at least one other patch to add the 'enum'. Any suggestions for how to handle that? Arnd