From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752868Ab0BWNtW (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:49:22 -0500 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]:57953 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752172Ab0BWNtV (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:49:21 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=TmnEcBdXtfUA:10 a=s2-BoHfGGTZFxdZV1tYA:9 a=cjV3mxiofAIgM_mp-KJMqKGs3loA:4 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.89.75 Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] ARM: ftrace: allow building without frame pointers From: Steven Rostedt To: Rabin Vincent Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Abhishek Sagar , Uwe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= In-Reply-To: <1266090518-31120-5-git-send-email-rabin@rab.in> References: <1266090518-31120-1-git-send-email-rabin@rab.in> <1266090518-31120-5-git-send-email-rabin@rab.in> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:47:05 -0500 Message-Id: <1266932825.19540.17.camel@frodo> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 (2.26.3-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 01:18 +0530, Rabin Vincent wrote: > With a new enough GCC, ARM function tracing can be supported without the > need for frame pointers. This is essential for Thumb-2 support, since > frame pointers aren't available then. > > Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig > index 6c22d8a..7468ffe 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig > +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig > @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ if FTRACE > config FUNCTION_TRACER > bool "Kernel Function Tracer" > depends on HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER > - select FRAME_POINTER > + select FRAME_POINTER if (!ARM_UNWIND) > select KALLSYMS > select GENERIC_TRACER > select CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER Ah, evolution is keeping these patches out of order, so I did not see this change before commenting about the change to the Makefile. A better comment is needed in the Makefile. -- Steve