From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] mm,migration: Do not try to migrate unmapped anonymous pages
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:16:24 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1269533784.1814.64.camel@barrios-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100325180221.e1d9bae7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 18:02 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:32:35 +0000
> Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:49:23AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:21:41PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > Hmmm...
> > > I haven't understand your mention because I guess I was wrong.
> > >
> > > probably my last question was unclear. I mean,
> > >
> > > 1) If we still need SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, why do we need to add refcount?
> > > Which difference is exist between normal page migration and compaction?
> >
> > The processes typically calling migration today own the page they are moving
> > and is not going to exit unexpectedly during migration.
> >
> > > 2) If we added refcount, which race will solve?
> > >
> >
> > The process exiting and the last anon_vma being dropped while compaction
> > is running. This can be reliably triggered with compaction.
> >
> > > IOW, Is this patch fix old issue or compaction specific issue?
> > >
> >
> > Strictly speaking, it's an old issue but in practice it's impossible to
> > trigger because the process migrating always owns the page. Compaction
> > moves pages belonging to arbitrary processes.
> >
> Kosaki-san,
>
> IIUC, the race in memory-hotunplug was fixed by this patch [2/11].
>
> But, this behavior of unmap_and_move() requires access to _freed_
> objects (spinlock). Even if it's safe because of SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU,
> it't not good habit in general.
I agree kosaki's opinion.
I guess Mel met the problem before this patch.
Apparently, It had a problem like Mel's description.
But we can close race window by this patch.
so we don't need to new ref counter.
At least, rcu_read_lock prevent anon_vma's free.
so we can hold spinlock of anon_vma although it's not good habit.
About reusing anon_vma by SLAB_XXX_RCU, page_check_address and
vma_address can prevent wrong working in try_to_unmap.
> After direct compaction, page-migration will be one of "core" code of
> memory management. Then, I agree to patch [1/11] as our direction for
> keeping sanity and showing direction to more updates. Maybe adding
> refcnt and removing RCU in futuer is good.
I agree. (use one locking rule)
I don't mean that we have to remove SLAB_XXX_RCU.
I want to reduce two locking rule with just one if we can.
As far as we can do, I hope hide rcu_read_lock by Kame's version.
(Kame's version copy & page)
==
if (PageAnon(page)) {
struct anon_vma anon = page_lock_anon_vma(page);
/* to take this lock, this page must be mapped. */
if (!anon_vma)
goto uncharge;
increase refcnt
page_unlock_anon_vma(anon);
}
....
==
and
==
void anon_vma_free(struct anon_vma *anon)
{
/*
* To increase refcnt of anon-vma, anon_vma->lock should be held by
* page_lock_anon_vma(). It means anon_vma has a "mapped" page.
* If this anon is freed by unmap or exit, all pages under this anon
* must be unmapped. Then, just checking refcnt without lock is ok.
*/
if (check refcnt > 0)
return do nothing
kmem_cache_free(anon);
}
==
Many locking rule would make many contributor very hard.
>
> IMHO, pushing this patch [2/11] as "BUGFIX" independent of this set and
> adding anon_vma->refcnt [1/11] and [3/11] in 1st Direct-compaction patch
> series to show the direction will makse sense.
> (I think merging 1/11 and 3/11 will be okay...)
Yes. For reducing locking, We can enhance it step by step after merge
[1/11] and [3/11] if others doesn't oppose it any more.
>
> Thanks,
> -Kame
>
>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-25 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-12 16:41 [PATCH 0/11] Memory Compaction v4 Mel Gorman
2010-03-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm,migration: Take a reference to the anon_vma before migrating Mel Gorman
2010-03-14 15:01 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-15 5:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-17 1:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-17 11:45 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-17 16:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-18 11:12 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-18 16:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm,migration: Do not try to migrate unmapped anonymous pages Mel Gorman
2010-03-15 0:28 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-15 5:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-15 6:28 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-15 6:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-15 7:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-15 13:48 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-15 7:11 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-15 11:28 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-15 12:48 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-15 14:21 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-15 14:33 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-15 23:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-17 2:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-17 3:00 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-17 3:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-17 4:15 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-17 4:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-17 16:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-18 0:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-17 12:07 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-17 2:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-17 11:51 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-18 0:48 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-18 11:14 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-19 6:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-19 8:59 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 2:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-25 8:32 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 8:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-25 9:18 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 9:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-25 9:09 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-25 9:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-25 9:21 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 9:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-25 9:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-25 10:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-25 13:39 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-26 3:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-26 13:49 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 15:29 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-26 0:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-26 1:39 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-25 14:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-25 16:16 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-03-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 03/11] mm: Share the anon_vma ref counts between KSM and page migration Mel Gorman
2010-03-12 17:14 ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-15 5:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-17 2:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 04/11] Allow CONFIG_MIGRATION to be set without CONFIG_NUMA or memory hot-remove Mel Gorman
2010-03-17 2:28 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-17 11:32 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-17 16:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-17 23:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-18 11:24 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-19 6:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-19 10:16 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 3:28 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 05/11] Export unusable free space index via /proc/unusable_index Mel Gorman
2010-03-15 5:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-15 9:48 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-17 2:42 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 06/11] Export fragmentation index via /proc/extfrag_index Mel Gorman
2010-03-17 2:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-17 11:33 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 0:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-23 12:03 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 2:47 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-25 8:47 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 11:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-25 14:11 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-26 3:10 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 07/11] Memory compaction core Mel Gorman
2010-03-15 13:44 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-15 14:41 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-17 10:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-17 11:40 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-18 2:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-18 11:43 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-19 6:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-18 17:08 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 08/11] Add /proc trigger for memory compaction Mel Gorman
2010-03-17 3:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] Add /sys trigger for per-node " Mel Gorman
2010-03-17 3:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] Direct compact when a high-order allocation fails Mel Gorman
2010-03-16 2:47 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-19 6:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-19 6:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-19 10:10 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 11:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-19 10:09 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-25 11:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-25 15:11 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-26 6:01 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 11/11] Do not compact within a preferred zone after a compaction failure Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 [PATCH 0/11] Memory Compaction v5 Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 12:25 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm,migration: Do not try to migrate unmapped anonymous pages Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 17:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-23 18:04 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1269533784.1814.64.camel@barrios-desktop \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).