linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"K . Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/2] hw-breakpoints: Handle breakpoint weight in allocation constraints
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:01:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271113280-10521-3-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271113280-10521-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com>

Depending on their nature and on what an arch supports, breakpoints
may consume more than one address register. For example a simple
absolute address match usually only requires one address register.
But an address range match may consume two registers.

Currently our slot allocation constraints, that tend to reflect the
limited arch's resources, always consider that a breakpoint consumes
one slot.

Then provide a way for archs to tell us the weight of a breakpoint
through a new hw_breakpoint_weight() helper. This weight will be
computed against the generic allocation constraints instead of
a constant value.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: K. Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 kernel/hw_breakpoint.c |   63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index cb8c013..34b7655 100644
--- a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -77,6 +77,11 @@ struct bp_busy_slots {
 /* Serialize accesses to the above constraints */
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(nr_bp_mutex);
 
+__weak int hw_breakpoint_weight(struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
 static inline enum bp_type_idx find_slot_idx(struct perf_event *bp)
 {
 	if (bp->attr.bp_type & HW_BREAKPOINT_RW)
@@ -124,7 +129,7 @@ static int task_bp_pinned(struct task_struct *tsk, enum bp_type_idx type)
 	list_for_each_entry(bp, list, event_entry) {
 		if (bp->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT)
 			if (find_slot_idx(bp) == type)
-				count++;
+				count += hw_breakpoint_weight(bp);
 	}
 
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
@@ -174,25 +179,40 @@ fetch_bp_busy_slots(struct bp_busy_slots *slots, struct perf_event *bp,
 }
 
 /*
+ * For now, continue to consider flexible as pinned, until we can
+ * ensure no flexible event can ever be scheduled before a pinned event
+ * in a same cpu.
+ */
+static void
+fetch_this_slot(struct bp_busy_slots *slots, int weight)
+{
+	slots->pinned += weight;
+}
+
+/*
  * Add a pinned breakpoint for the given task in our constraint table
  */
 static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct task_struct *tsk, int cpu, bool enable,
-				enum bp_type_idx type)
+				enum bp_type_idx type, int weight)
 {
 	unsigned int *tsk_pinned;
-	int count = 0;
+	int old_count = 0;
+	int old_idx = 0;
+	int idx = 0;
 
-	count = task_bp_pinned(tsk, type);
+	old_count = task_bp_pinned(tsk, type);
+	old_idx = old_count - 1;
+	idx = old_idx + weight;
 
 	tsk_pinned = per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned[type], cpu);
 	if (enable) {
-		tsk_pinned[count]++;
-		if (count > 0)
-			tsk_pinned[count-1]--;
+		tsk_pinned[idx]++;
+		if (old_count > 0)
+			tsk_pinned[old_idx]--;
 	} else {
-		tsk_pinned[count]--;
-		if (count > 0)
-			tsk_pinned[count-1]++;
+		tsk_pinned[idx]--;
+		if (old_count > 0)
+			tsk_pinned[old_idx]++;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -200,7 +220,8 @@ static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct task_struct *tsk, int cpu, bool enable,
  * Add/remove the given breakpoint in our constraint table
  */
 static void
-toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum bp_type_idx type)
+toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum bp_type_idx type,
+	       int weight)
 {
 	int cpu = bp->cpu;
 	struct task_struct *tsk = bp->ctx->task;
@@ -208,20 +229,20 @@ toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum bp_type_idx type)
 	/* Pinned counter task profiling */
 	if (tsk) {
 		if (cpu >= 0) {
-			toggle_bp_task_slot(tsk, cpu, enable, type);
+			toggle_bp_task_slot(tsk, cpu, enable, type, weight);
 			return;
 		}
 
 		for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
-			toggle_bp_task_slot(tsk, cpu, enable, type);
+			toggle_bp_task_slot(tsk, cpu, enable, type, weight);
 		return;
 	}
 
 	/* Pinned counter cpu profiling */
 	if (enable)
-		per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned[type], bp->cpu)++;
+		per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned[type], bp->cpu) += weight;
 	else
-		per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned[type], bp->cpu)--;
+		per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned[type], bp->cpu) -= weight;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -269,6 +290,7 @@ static int __reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
 {
 	struct bp_busy_slots slots = {0};
 	enum bp_type_idx type;
+	int weight;
 
 	/* Basic checks */
 	if (bp->attr.bp_type == HW_BREAKPOINT_EMPTY ||
@@ -276,13 +298,16 @@ static int __reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	type = find_slot_idx(bp);
+	weight = hw_breakpoint_weight(bp);
+
 	fetch_bp_busy_slots(&slots, bp, type);
+	fetch_this_slot(&slots, weight);
 
 	/* Flexible counters need to keep at least one slot */
-	if (slots.pinned + (!!slots.flexible) == HBP_NUM)
+	if (slots.pinned + (!!slots.flexible) > HBP_NUM)
 		return -ENOSPC;
 
-	toggle_bp_slot(bp, true, type);
+	toggle_bp_slot(bp, true, type, weight);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -303,9 +328,11 @@ int reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
 static void __release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
 {
 	enum bp_type_idx type;
+	int weight;
 
 	type = find_slot_idx(bp);
-	toggle_bp_slot(bp, false, type);
+	weight = hw_breakpoint_weight(bp);
+	toggle_bp_slot(bp, false, type, weight);
 }
 
 void release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp)
-- 
1.6.2.3


      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-13  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-12 23:01 [RFC PATCH 0/2] hw-breakpoints allocation constraints updates Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-12 23:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] hw-breakpoints: Separate constraint space for data and instruction breakpoints Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-16 14:35   ` Will Deacon
2010-04-16 14:56     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-12 23:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1271113280-10521-3-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).