From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754696Ab0DQTzW (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2010 15:55:22 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:48941 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753831Ab0DQTzV (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2010 15:55:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [idled]: Idle Cycle Injector for power capping From: Peter Zijlstra To: tytso@mit.edu Cc: Salman , mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, arjan@infradead.org, csadler@google.com, ranjitm@google.com, kenchen@google.com, dawnchen@google.com In-Reply-To: <20100417170808.GE32634@thunk.org> References: <20100413234902.29004.41655.stgit@bumblebee1.mtv.corp.google.com> <1271317886.32749.69.camel@laptop> <20100417170808.GE32634@thunk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:51:28 +0200 Message-ID: <1271533888.1674.486.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 13:08 -0400, tytso@mit.edu wrote: > I think it's well understood > that when these patches are ready to be merged, they need to be > submitted right before the merge window opens, against a recent -rc > kernel. No, they need to be in the relevant subsystem tree by then, patch submissions to subsystem trees right before the merge window opens are bound to get delayed another cycle.