From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571E5CA9EA0 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 10:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3467E217F5 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 10:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728711AbfKDKyK (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Nov 2019 05:54:10 -0500 Received: from outbound.smtp.vt.edu ([198.82.183.121]:34418 "EHLO omr2.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728507AbfKDKyJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Nov 2019 05:54:09 -0500 Received: from mr6.cc.vt.edu (mr6.cc.ipv6.vt.edu [IPv6:2607:b400:92:8500:0:af:2d00:4488]) by omr2.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xA4As3C8023480 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 05:54:03 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f199.google.com (mail-qt1-f199.google.com [209.85.160.199]) by mr6.cc.vt.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id xA4ArwoX031077 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 05:54:03 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f199.google.com with SMTP id g5so11670648qtc.5 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 02:54:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:date:message-id; bh=O4sSEohI+9ePFu7NIh17h34X06dA5Ss7wezIrk0/sMM=; b=d9ljh9R5xG/+7QR72GGfasMWBOyNaXRRpMAc9+nGQs7GoCPqmZ18fnf/oWKFaD107S 7Shor1AhBo9/Io46NmIlGz9JRUixGTT5k+Rua+TvFPjaoBEi2oouDeHbWz6dY1GGBp6r jdLpuJSCDZSt0irmVA4dgZq0UIOojVr8GlPmNrYMALld6kpO+IwBcWtP8fHQQymqUyGm fAxLDDQCBp0OkzCz2WX21+2psK+s9qG/rO2cffxWmlQqAzxflHA7OUOosW5RTTdG8dDK U6AAC9TwCibEWrK0SoOKZleWP75bp+3E/O9ffyqf0VzSavob6dpqrxATtpzs97Sz/KP6 +eXA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUlxm2OOSXvDtn8SIgdlNSRQSZj3/1ICI1lsf9ejl31scitbYR6 ecnOTk/xuW/2f/T9xUenAH/GExXd/wySa+FVltFDIdXmIYEF3Mno2cdHs6OEvZevVoGlYxAsz9t r1i2HQAibitYF4ggryqgitcnnSLoKSxzR9Ew= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5349:: with SMTP id v9mr19958008qvs.55.1572864837962; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 02:53:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwstpqpeboZZUEmIXv+bMXs6fTpFWmQmyQJOF4uLfKs2q0utFPvv23/qq1PCoH4UlOCj6735g== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5349:: with SMTP id v9mr19957995qvs.55.1572864837661; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 02:53:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from turing-police ([2601:5c0:c001:c9e1::359]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l124sm193608qkf.122.2019.11.04.02.53.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 04 Nov 2019 02:53:56 -0800 (PST) From: "Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks" X-Google-Original-From: "Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks" X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.7+dev To: Dan Carpenter Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_SUCCESS In-Reply-To: <20191104100413.GC10409@kadam> References: <20191104014510.102356-1-Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> <20191104014510.102356-8-Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> <20191104100413.GC10409@kadam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1572864835_14215P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 05:53:55 -0500 Message-ID: <128761.1572864835@turing-police> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1572864835_14215P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mon, 04 Nov 2019 13:04:14 +0300, Dan Carpenter said: > On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 08:45:03PM -0500, Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > > - if (sector_read(sb, sec, &bp->buf_bh, 1) != FFS_SUCCESS) { > > + if (sector_read(sb, sec, &bp->buf_bh, 1) != 0) { > > It's better to just remove the "!= 0" double negative. != 0 should be > used when we are talking about the number zero as in "cnt != 0" and for > "strcmp(foo, bar) != 0" where it means that "foo != bar". "Fix up ==0 and !=0" is indeed on the to-do list. This patch converted 82 uses of FFS_SUCCESS, of which 33 had the != idiom in use. Meanwhile, overall there's 53 '!= 0' and 95 '== 0' uses. In other words, even if I fixed all of those that were involved in this patch, there would *still* be more patching to do. --==_Exmh_1572864835_14215P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 iQIVAwUBXcADQgdmEQWDXROgAQKAchAAtemIJM4rEnk/fzHoPM8wtbMrApsfS8oQ xZk0xQ6DGVGwCR67LvNuy3qU5sgSXDuI6+0Egf/63qzQdyZ4C87x49m0p3J6dctU wFwVlDwlr49ZbCcHDWD/lI7B3cc+1iwxAcMYVXQGMsF4dNckVLzHXjP7PEq0eMnP xZKkGxU9pvJLpiuCckiJTda+qG9xPJDh9BqsT6L3XQD/yN8ajurYPVkv1FXRiiBY Xzxw1Vd3vM8lxLyE2KtSB2VVlWGxK8HC9fw49p1RkKpcdXLBYPnf9dy7umSpTM4U 7nPYVj/MMvis4pDb7dRDBicSqgoQd+Np3dz0bHRvHCmq5i3zrxhaYuCaJ+RreRXi 3i4nanOeI43RZ5qfUkUZJm2AthINcNCRLysmprSherVa7jvCr7QJXtkizJgVeYou Kx/ND16wpQe96G8TzyQXHQx1Ki+0jnjkQLOp1xZ+I4/Zua8KPqrKXafIfzBhQSOx 5FJCXe07qrjJUAfKR/oVTtlzqOQl6tbRNIjClPiJRwfocpEaZi5XBi8Og3cfEi44 +RR9euNuePOCK4wpTOn9u5GBlCIy8IpRdOfMaU3Amh1uzo3rS8cU7fRQYfovmySI Js1wW1Jc4vdXm6Zx9ijVxxECcK/DfjxGKSTeCqt3Hlo3JxbBX2Q7jvGm4fu066bq /etC95DRebU= =E3XH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1572864835_14215P--