From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932664Ab0KLQnt (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:43:49 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:46511 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932358Ab0KLQns convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:43:48 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 02/22] sched: add extended scheduling interface From: Peter Zijlstra To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Raistlin , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Chris Friesen , oleg@redhat.com, Frederic Weisbecker , Darren Hart , Johan Eker , "p.faure" , linux-kernel , Claudio Scordino , michael trimarchi , Fabio Checconi , Tommaso Cucinotta , Juri Lelli , Nicola Manica , Luca Abeni , Dhaval Giani , Harald Gustafsson , paulmck In-Reply-To: <1289579924.12418.404.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References: <1288333128.8661.137.camel@Palantir> <1288333622.8661.141.camel@Palantir> <1289579924.12418.404.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:43:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1289580222.2084.318.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 11:38 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > A while ago I implemented an EDF scheduler for a client (before working > with Red Hat), and one thing they asked about was having a "soft group", > which was basically: This group is guaranteed X runtime in Y period, but > if the system is idle, let the group run, even if it has exhausted its X > runtime. > > Is this supported? No, some of the bits in 18/22 come near, but I'd prefer not to add such things until we've got a convincing use-case.