From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754499Ab1CNHD2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2011 03:03:28 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48705 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752584Ab1CNHD1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2011 03:03:27 -0400 Subject: RE: PROBLEM: brcm80211 unable to survive suspend/resume cycle From: Jon Masters To: Arend Van Spriel Cc: devel , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1295459500.9781.127.camel@constitution.bos.jonmasters.org> References: <1289272437.3916.440.camel@constitution.bos.jonmasters.org> <7A94256FD72B884D9E7C55586C3CBCEE13840C62AA@SJEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <1289880279.3916.889.camel@constitution.bos.jonmasters.org> <1293028287.6319.171.camel@constitution.bos.jonmasters.org> ,<1295457365.9781.108.camel@constitution.bos.jonmasters.org> <400C43189542CE41BC0A5B252FC90136952F059547@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <1295459500.9781.127.camel@constitution.bos.jonmasters.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 03:09:18 -0400 Message-ID: <1300086558.22748.38.camel@constitution.bos.jonmasters.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:51 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 09:43 -0800, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > > > I tried to give you a heads up. I submitted the patch last friday to the > > staging-2.6 repository. Not sure whether it has propagated to the 2.6.3[78] > > kernels yet. > > Awesome. Sometime soon, I guess it will land and I'll test it for you :) Latest upstream staging is working across suspend quite nicely. I did, however, separately ping David Woodhouse to let him know that there is some discrepancy between the firmware names you are looking for in the brcm80211 driver and the firmware names in the linux-firmware rawhide (Fedora) package such that one has to manually symlink stuff - can you confirm that the current naming you're looking for is going to remain consistent in the future if symlinks are fixed in linux-firmware? Jon.