LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/13] x86: Replace memblock_x86_find_in_range_size() with for_each_free_mem_range()
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:16:00 +0200
Message-ID: <1310462166-31469-8-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310462166-31469-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

setup_bios_corruption_check() and memtest do_one_pass() open code
memblock free area iteration using memblock_x86_find_in_range_size().
Convert them to use for_each_free_mem_range() instead.

This leaves memblock_x86_find_in_range_size() and
memblock_x86_check_reserved_size() unused.  Kill them.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h |    3 --
 arch/x86/kernel/check.c         |   34 +++++++++------------
 arch/x86/mm/memblock.c          |   62 ---------------------------------------
 arch/x86/mm/memtest.c           |   31 ++++++++-----------
 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
index 1460db2..d2a5a59 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
@@ -3,8 +3,6 @@
 
 #define ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
 
-u64 memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(u64 start, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
-
 void memblock_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name);
 void memblock_x86_free_range(u64 start, u64 end);
 struct range;
@@ -15,6 +13,5 @@ int get_free_all_memory_range(struct range **rangep, int nodeid);
 u64 memblock_x86_hole_size(u64 start, u64 end);
 u64 memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit);
 u64 memblock_x86_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit);
-bool memblock_x86_check_reserved_size(u64 *addrp, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/check.c b/arch/x86/kernel/check.c
index 95680fc..621cd23 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/check.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/check.c
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ early_param("memory_corruption_check_size", set_corruption_check_size);
 
 void __init setup_bios_corruption_check(void)
 {
-	u64 addr = PAGE_SIZE;	/* assume first page is reserved anyway */
+	phys_addr_t start, end;
+	u64 i;
 
 	if (memory_corruption_check == -1) {
 		memory_corruption_check =
@@ -82,28 +83,23 @@ void __init setup_bios_corruption_check(void)
 
 	corruption_check_size = round_up(corruption_check_size, PAGE_SIZE);
 
-	while (addr < corruption_check_size && num_scan_areas < MAX_SCAN_AREAS) {
-		u64 size;
-		addr = memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(addr, &size, PAGE_SIZE);
+	for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start, &end, NULL) {
+		start = clamp_t(phys_addr_t, round_up(start, PAGE_SIZE),
+				PAGE_SIZE, corruption_check_size);
+		end = clamp_t(phys_addr_t, round_down(end, PAGE_SIZE),
+			      PAGE_SIZE, corruption_check_size);
+		if (start >= end)
+			continue;
 
-		if (!addr)
-			break;
-
-		if (addr >= corruption_check_size)
-			break;
-
-		if ((addr + size) > corruption_check_size)
-			size = corruption_check_size - addr;
-
-		memblock_x86_reserve_range(addr, addr + size, "SCAN RAM");
-		scan_areas[num_scan_areas].addr = addr;
-		scan_areas[num_scan_areas].size = size;
-		num_scan_areas++;
+		memblock_x86_reserve_range(start, end, "SCAN RAM");
+		scan_areas[num_scan_areas].addr = start;
+		scan_areas[num_scan_areas].size = end - start;
 
 		/* Assume we've already mapped this early memory */
-		memset(__va(addr), 0, size);
+		memset(__va(start), 0, end - start);
 
-		addr += size;
+		if (++num_scan_areas >= MAX_SCAN_AREAS)
+			break;
 	}
 
 	if (num_scan_areas)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
index 97fbc39..648d47d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
@@ -7,68 +7,6 @@
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/range.h>
 
-/* Check for already reserved areas */
-bool __init memblock_x86_check_reserved_size(u64 *addrp, u64 *sizep, u64 align)
-{
-	struct memblock_region *r;
-	u64 addr = *addrp, last;
-	u64 size = *sizep;
-	bool changed = false;
-
-again:
-	last = addr + size;
-	for_each_memblock(reserved, r) {
-		if (last > r->base && addr < r->base) {
-			size = r->base - addr;
-			changed = true;
-			goto again;
-		}
-		if (last > (r->base + r->size) && addr < (r->base + r->size)) {
-			addr = round_up(r->base + r->size, align);
-			size = last - addr;
-			changed = true;
-			goto again;
-		}
-		if (last <= (r->base + r->size) && addr >= r->base) {
-			*sizep = 0;
-			return false;
-		}
-	}
-	if (changed) {
-		*addrp = addr;
-		*sizep = size;
-	}
-	return changed;
-}
-
-/*
- * Find next free range after start, and size is returned in *sizep
- */
-u64 __init memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(u64 start, u64 *sizep, u64 align)
-{
-	struct memblock_region *r;
-
-	for_each_memblock(memory, r) {
-		u64 ei_start = r->base;
-		u64 ei_last = ei_start + r->size;
-		u64 addr;
-
-		addr = round_up(ei_start, align);
-		if (addr < start)
-			addr = round_up(start, align);
-		if (addr >= ei_last)
-			continue;
-		*sizep = ei_last - addr;
-		while (memblock_x86_check_reserved_size(&addr, sizep, align))
-			;
-
-		if (*sizep)
-			return addr;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static __init struct range *find_range_array(int count)
 {
 	u64 end, size, mem;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
index 92faf3a..46a5ff2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
@@ -70,24 +70,19 @@ static void __init memtest(u64 pattern, u64 start_phys, u64 size)
 
 static void __init do_one_pass(u64 pattern, u64 start, u64 end)
 {
-	u64 size = 0;
-
-	while (start < end) {
-		start = memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(start, &size, 1);
-
-		/* done ? */
-		if (start >= end)
-			break;
-		if (start + size > end)
-			size = end - start;
-
-		printk(KERN_INFO "  %010llx - %010llx pattern %016llx\n",
-		       (unsigned long long) start,
-		       (unsigned long long) start + size,
-		       (unsigned long long) cpu_to_be64(pattern));
-		memtest(pattern, start, size);
-
-		start += size;
+	u64 i;
+	phys_addr_t this_start, this_end;
+
+	for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &this_start, &this_end, NULL) {
+		this_start = clamp_t(phys_addr_t, this_start, start, end);
+		this_end = clamp_t(phys_addr_t, this_end, start, end);
+		if (this_start < this_end) {
+			printk(KERN_INFO "  %010llx - %010llx pattern %016llx\n",
+			       (unsigned long long)this_start,
+			       (unsigned long long)this_end,
+			       (unsigned long long)cpu_to_be64(pattern));
+			memtest(pattern, this_start, this_end - this_start);
+		}
 	}
 }
 
-- 
1.7.6


  parent reply index

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-12  9:15 [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 01/13] memblock: Remove memblock_memory_can_coalesce() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:31   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 02/13] memblock: Reimplement memblock_add_region() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:32   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 03/13] memblock: Add optional region->nid Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:43   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:32     ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  1:35   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14  9:44   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:33     ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86: Use __memblock_alloc_base() in early_reserve_e820() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:33   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 06/13] memblock: Implement for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:34   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-07-14 21:34   ` [tip:x86/memblock] x86: Replace memblock_x86_find_in_range_size() with for_each_free_mem_range() tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 08/13] memblock, x86: Make free_all_memory_core_early() explicitly free lowmem only Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:35   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 09/13] memblock, x86: Replace __get_free_all_memory_range() with for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:35   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 10/13] memblock, x86: Reimplement memblock_find_dma_reserve() using iterators Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:36   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86: Use absent_pages_in_range() instead of memblock_x86_hole_size() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:36   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 12/13] memblock, x86: Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config option Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:46   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:37     ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 13/13] memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free_range() with generic ones Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:10   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:20     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:23       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:32         ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:38           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:41             ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:43               ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 21:38     ` [tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Cast phys_addr_t to unsigned long long for printf use tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 21:37   ` [tip:x86/memblock] memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free_range() with generic ones tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 21:06   ` [PATCH 13/13] " Yinghai Lu
2011-07-26 21:46     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-27  0:59       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-27  8:07         ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 23:26 ` [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Yinghai Lu
2011-07-13  3:21   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-13  9:16     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-13  9:11   ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-13 19:06     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-14  9:42 ` [PATCH 2.5/13] memblock: Use __meminit[data] instead of __init[data] Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:00   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-14 21:24     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-15  5:45     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:32   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:49 ` [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1310462166-31469-8-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0 lkml/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1 lkml/git/1.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2 lkml/git/2.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/3 lkml/git/3.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4 lkml/git/4.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5 lkml/git/5.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6 lkml/git/6.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7 lkml/git/7.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8 lkml/git/8.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml \
		linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index lkml

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git