linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Shan Hai <haishan.bai@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	paulus@samba.org, tglx@linutronix.de, walken@google.com,
	dhowells@redhat.com, cmetcalf@tilera.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fixup write permission of TLB on powerpc e500 core
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:53:16 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310961196.25044.266.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310944453.25044.262.camel@pasglop>

On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 09:14 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> In fact, with such a flag, we could probably avoid the ifdef entirely, and
> always go toward the PTE fixup path when called in such a fixup case, my gut
> feeling is that this is going to be seldom enough not to hurt x86 measurably
> but we'll have to try it out.
> 
> That leads to that even less tested patch:

 And here's a version that builds (still not tested :-)

Shan, can you verify whether that fixes the problem for you ?

I also had a cursory glance at the ARM code and it seems to rely on the
same stuff as embedded powerpc does for dirty/young updates, so in
theory it should exhibit the same problem.

I suspect the scenario is rare enough in practice in embedded workloads
that nobody noticed until now.

Cheers,
Ben.

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c b/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c
index 06c564e..e8ef0e6 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c
@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ static int sil24_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 				DRV_NAME);
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
-	iomap = pcim_iomap_table(pdev);
+	iomap = pcim_iomap_table~(pdev);
 
 	/* apply workaround for completion IRQ loss on PCI-X errata */
 	if (pi.flags & SIL24_FLAG_PCIX_IRQ_WOC) {
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 9670f71..8a76694 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1546,6 +1546,7 @@ struct page *follow_page(struct vm_area_struct *, unsigned long address,
 #define FOLL_MLOCK	0x40	/* mark page as mlocked */
 #define FOLL_SPLIT	0x80	/* don't return transhuge pages, split them */
 #define FOLL_HWPOISON	0x100	/* check page is hwpoisoned */
+#define FOLL_FIXFAULT	0x200	/* fixup after a fault (PTE dirty/young upd) */
 
 typedef int (*pte_fn_t)(pte_t *pte, pgtable_t token, unsigned long addr,
 			void *data);
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index fe28dc2..02adff7 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -355,8 +355,8 @@ static int fault_in_user_writeable(u32 __user *uaddr)
 	int ret;
 
 	down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
-	ret = get_user_pages(current, mm, (unsigned long)uaddr,
-			     1, 1, 0, NULL, NULL);
+	ret = __get_user_pages(current, mm, (unsigned long)uaddr, 1,
+			       FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_FIXFAULT, NULL, NULL, NULL);
 	up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
 
 	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 40b7531..94b1d3f 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -1419,6 +1419,29 @@ int zap_vma_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zap_vma_ptes);
 
+static void handle_pte_sw_young_dirty(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+				      unsigned long address,
+				      pte_t *ptep, int write)
+{
+	pte_t entry = *ptep;
+
+	if (write)
+		pte_mkdirty(entry);
+	entry = pte_mkyoung(entry);
+	if (ptep_set_access_flags(vma, address, ptep, entry, write)) {
+		update_mmu_cache(vma, address, ptep);
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * This is needed only for protection faults but the arch code
+		 * is not yet telling us if this is a protection fault or not.
+		 * This still avoids useless tlb flushes for .text page faults
+		 * with threads.
+		 */
+		if (write)
+			flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault(vma, address);
+	}
+}
+
 /**
  * follow_page - look up a page descriptor from a user-virtual address
  * @vma: vm_area_struct mapping @address
@@ -1514,16 +1537,22 @@ split_fallthrough:
 
 	if (flags & FOLL_GET)
 		get_page(page);
-	if (flags & FOLL_TOUCH) {
-		if ((flags & FOLL_WRITE) &&
-		    !pte_dirty(pte) && !PageDirty(page))
-			set_page_dirty(page);
-		/*
-		 * pte_mkyoung() would be more correct here, but atomic care
-		 * is needed to avoid losing the dirty bit: it is easier to use
-		 * mark_page_accessed().
-		 */
-		mark_page_accessed(page);
+
+	if (!pte_young(pte) || ((flags & FOLL_WRITE) && !pte_dirty(pte))) {
+		if (flags & FOLL_FIXFAULT)
+			handle_pte_sw_young_dirty(vma, address, ptep,
+						  flags & FOLL_WRITE);
+		else if (flags & FOLL_TOUCH) {
+			if ((flags & FOLL_WRITE) &&
+			    !pte_dirty(pte) && !PageDirty(page))
+				set_page_dirty(page);
+			/*
+			 * pte_mkyoung() would be more correct here, but atomic care
+			 * is needed to avoid losing the dirty bit: it is easier to use
+			 * mark_page_accessed().
+			 */
+			mark_page_accessed(page);
+		}
 	}
 	if ((flags & FOLL_MLOCK) && (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)) {
 		/*
@@ -3358,21 +3387,8 @@ int handle_pte_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		if (!pte_write(entry))
 			return do_wp_page(mm, vma, address,
 					pte, pmd, ptl, entry);
-		entry = pte_mkdirty(entry);
-	}
-	entry = pte_mkyoung(entry);
-	if (ptep_set_access_flags(vma, address, pte, entry, flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE)) {
-		update_mmu_cache(vma, address, pte);
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * This is needed only for protection faults but the arch code
-		 * is not yet telling us if this is a protection fault or not.
-		 * This still avoids useless tlb flushes for .text page faults
-		 * with threads.
-		 */
-		if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE)
-			flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault(vma, address);
 	}
+	handle_pte_sw_young_dirty(vma, address, pte, flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE);
 unlock:
 	pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
 	return 0;



  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-18  4:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-15  8:07 [PATCH 0/1] Fixup write permission of TLB on powerpc e500 core Shan Hai
2011-07-15  8:07 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Shan Hai
2011-07-15 10:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-15 15:18     ` Shan Hai
2011-07-15 15:24       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-16 15:36         ` Shan Hai
2011-07-16 14:50     ` Shan Hai
2011-07-16 23:49       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-17  9:38         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-17 14:29           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-17 23:14             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-18  3:53               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2011-07-18  4:02                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-18  4:01               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-18  6:48                 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-18  7:01                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-18  7:26                     ` Shan Hai
2011-07-18  7:36                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-18  7:50                         ` Shan Hai
2011-07-19  3:30                         ` Shan Hai
2011-07-19  4:20                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-19  4:29                           ` [RFC/PATCH] mm/futex: Fix futex writes on archs with SW tracking of dirty & young Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-19  4:55                             ` Shan Hai
2011-07-19  5:17                             ` Shan Hai
2011-07-19  5:24                               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-19  5:38                                 ` Shan Hai
2011-07-19  7:46                                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-19  8:24                                     ` Shan Hai
2011-07-19  8:26                                       ` [RFC/PATCH] mm/futex: Fix futex writes on archs with SW trackingof " David Laight
2011-07-19  8:45                                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-19  8:45                                         ` Shan Hai
2011-07-19 11:10                             ` [RFC/PATCH] mm/futex: Fix futex writes on archs with SW tracking of " Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-20 14:39                             ` Darren Hart
2011-07-21 22:36                             ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-21 22:52                               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-21 22:57                                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-21 22:59                                 ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-22  1:40                                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-22  1:54                                   ` Shan Hai
2011-07-27  6:50                             ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-27  7:58                               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-27  8:59                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-27 10:09                                 ` David Howells
2011-07-27 10:17                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-27 10:20                                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-28  0:12                                       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-08-08  2:31                                     ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-28 10:55                                   ` David Howells
2011-07-17 11:02         ` [PATCH 1/1] Fixup write permission of TLB on powerpc e500 core Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-17 13:33           ` Shan Hai
2011-07-17 14:48             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-17 15:40               ` Shan Hai
2011-07-17 22:34                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-17 14:34           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-15  8:20 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-15  8:38   ` MailingLists
2011-07-15  8:44     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-15  9:08       ` Shan Hai
2011-07-15  9:12         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-15  9:50         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-15 10:06           ` Shan Hai
2011-07-15 10:32             ` David Laight
2011-07-15 10:39               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-15 15:32               ` Shan Hai
2011-07-16  0:20                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-16 15:03                   ` Shan Hai
2011-07-15 23:47               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-15  9:07     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-07-15  9:05   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1310961196.25044.266.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=haishan.bai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).